A

Mapping Interindividual Variability of Toxicodynamics Using High-Throughput Transcriptomics and Primary Human Hepatocytes from Fifty Donors

Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 132, pp. 37005

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding the variability across the human population with respect to toxicodynamic responses after exposure to chemicals, such as environmental toxicants or drugs, is essential to define safety factors for risk assessment to protect the entire population. Activation of cellular stress response pathways are early adverse outcome pathway (AOP) key events of chemical-induced toxicity and would elucidate the estimation of population variability of toxicodynamic responses. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to map the variability in cellular stress response activation in a large panel of primary human hepatocyte (PHH) donors to aid in the quantification of toxicodynamic interindividual variability to derive safety uncertainty factors. METHODS: signaling. Using a population mixed-effect framework, the distribution of benchmark concentrations (BMCs) and maximum fold change were modeled to evaluate the influence of PHH donor panel size on the correct estimation of interindividual variability for the various stimuli. RESULTS: signaling-related genes, respectively. Population modeling revealed that small PHH panel sizes systematically underestimated the variance and gave low probabilities in estimating the correct human population variance. Estimated toxicodynamic variability factors of stress response activation in PHHs based on this dataset ranged between 1.6 and 6.3. DISCUSSION: -based prediction of adverse responses, in particular hepatotoxicity. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11891.

Authors 11

  1. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

  2. Simcyp (United Kingdom)

    Affiliation as printed

    Simcyp Division, CERTARA, Sheffield, UK

  3. Simcyp (United Kingdom)

    Affiliation as printed

    Simcyp Division, CERTARA, Sheffield, UK

  4. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

  5. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

  6. Affiliation as printed

    KaLy-Cell, Plobsheim, France

  7. Affiliation as printed

    KaLy-Cell, Plobsheim, France

  8. Affiliation as printed

    KaLy-Cell, Plobsheim, France

    Zylan, Obernai, France

  9. National Institutes of Health · National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

    Affiliation as printed

    Division of the National Toxicology Program, NIEHS, NIH, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA

  10. Simcyp (United Kingdom)

    Affiliation as printed

    Simcyp Division, CERTARA, Sheffield, UK

  11. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Division of Drug Discovery and Safety, LACDR, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

Cited by 16 stored of 16

16 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 70