A

The HydroGym reinforcement learning platform for fluid dynamics

Nature, vol. 657, pp. 369–376

Abstract

Effective control of fluid flows is critical across transportation, energy and medicine, where it can increase lift, reduce drag, enhance mixing and attenuate noise1–3. Yet fluids are notoriously difficult to control because they involve high-dimensional, nonlinear and multiscale dynamics that resist conventional approaches4–6. Reinforcement learning has driven remarkable progress in fields such as protein folding and complex games, which have shared benchmarks and standardized environments7–10. Fluid dynamics has lacked such infrastructure, so each controller is typically tuned to a single geometry and operating condition, making progress difficult to accumulate, transfer and compare11–13. Here we introduce HydroGym, a solver-independent reinforcement learning platform providing more than 60 validated, openly available flow control environments spanning from canonical laminar flows to complex turbulent flows, with systematic progression in the Reynolds number up to Re = 4 × 105, and Mach number variations in two and three dimensions. Across these environments, agents repeatedly discover robust control principles, including boundary layer manipulation, disruption of acoustic feedback and reorganization of turbulent wakes. Critically, we demonstrate a proof of concept for zero-shot transfer, in which agents that are trained exclusively in inexpensive surrogate environments are deployed to challenging real-world scenarios such as a three-dimensional wing section. We achieve a 38% reduction in local skin friction while reducing exploration costs by four orders of magnitude compared with direct on-wing optimization. As this transfer exploits shared near-wall physics, the breadth of generalization remains open, suggesting a new pathway for research toward policy generalization across computationally prohibitive simulation environments. By offering a common, extensible foundation for reproducible research, HydroGym moves flow control from isolated case studies toward a cohesive community effort. HydroGym offers over 60 standardized reinforcement-learning flow-control environments and demonstrates zero-shot transfer to a 3D wing, cutting local skin friction by 38% and exploration costs by four orders of magnitude.

Authors 21

  1. Christian Lagemann corresponding

    University of Washington

    Affiliation as printed

    AI Institute in Dynamic Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. christian.lagemann@rwth-aachen.de

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. christian.lagemann@rwth-aachen.de

  2. University of Washington

    Affiliation as printed

    AI Institute in Dynamic Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

  3. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Chair of Fluid Mechanics and Institute of Aerodynamics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  4. Inha University

    Affiliation as printed

    Data-Driven Fluid Engineering Laboratory, Inha University, Incheon, South Korea

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, State University of New York, Incheon, South Korea

  5. University of Michigan

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

  6. KTH Royal Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    FLOW, Engineering Mechanics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

  7. Technical University of Munich

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

  8. Technical University of Munich

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

  9. Technical University of Munich

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

  10. University of Washington

    Affiliation as printed

    AI Institute in Dynamic Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

  11. University of Washington

    Affiliation as printed

    AI Institute in Dynamic Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

  12. University of Washington

    Affiliation as printed

    AI Institute in Dynamic Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

  13. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Chair of Fluid Mechanics and Institute of Aerodynamics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  14. Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers · Arts et Métiers · HESAM Université · Laboratoire de Dynamique des Fluides

    Affiliation as printed

    Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, CNAM, DynFluid, HESAM Université, Paris, France

  15. Technical University of Munich

    Affiliation as printed

    Munich Institute of Integrated Materials, Energy and Process Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    School of Engineering and Design, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

  16. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Chair of Fluid Mechanics and Institute of Aerodynamics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

    JARA Center for Simulation and Data Science, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  17. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Chair of Fluid Mechanics and Institute of Aerodynamics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

    JARA Center for Simulation and Data Science, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  18. German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases

    Affiliation as printed

    MediaTek Research, London, UK

    Statistics and Machine Learning, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases, Bonn, Germany

  19. University of Washington

    Affiliation as printed

    AI Institute in Dynamic Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

  20. Ricardo Vinuesa corresponding

    University of Michigan · KTH Royal Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. rvinuesa@umich.edu

    FLOW, Engineering Mechanics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. rvinuesa@umich.edu

  21. Steven L. Brunton corresponding

    University of Washington

    Affiliation as printed

    AI Institute in Dynamic Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. sbrunton@uw.edu

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. sbrunton@uw.edu

Cited by 1 stored of 1

1 result

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 48