Implementation models for teacher peer feedback: A systematic review
European Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 49, pp. 665–683
Abstract
Although the effects of teacher peer feedback have been previously examined, peer feedback is implemented differently in continuous professional development (CPD) programmes. Thus, a review of the implementation of teacher peer feedback can provide us with an integrated perspective of this activity, and it may further improve the practices of teacher CPD in the future. This study systematically reviewed 29 empirical articles in the last 20 years. Four implementation models of teacher peer feedback are distinguished: lesson study-based peer feedback, research-initiated peer feedback, supervisor-guided peer feedback, and self-regulated peer feedback. Additionally, five influential factors are found to affect teacher peer feedback: characteristics of participants, training and supervision, schedule and duration, support and tools, and characteristics of feedback. These findings imply that programme organisers should design peer feedback based on the precise analysis of the peer feedback model, influential factors, training goals, participants’ competencies, and learning needs.
Authors 4
-
Jiangsu Normal University · Leiden University
Affiliation as printed
Jiangsu Normal University
Leiden University
ICLON Graduate School of Teaching, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
School of Education Science, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu Province, PR China
-
Dineke E.H. Tigelaar Aachen
Affiliation as printed
Leiden University
ICLON Graduate School of Teaching, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
-
University of Applied Sciences Leiden
Affiliation as printed
University of Applied Sciences Leiden
Faculty of Education, University of Applied Sciences Leiden, Leiden, the Netherlands
-
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
Affiliation as printed
Oslo Metropolitan University
Centre for the Study of Professions, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
Cited by 3 stored of 3
3 results
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).