You are lying! How misinformation accusations spread on Twitter

Internet Research, vol. 33, pp. 1907–1927

Abstract

Purpose Misinformation is notoriously difficult to combat. Although social media firms have focused on combating the publication of misinformation, misinformation accusations, an important by-product of the spread of misinformation, have been neglected. The authors offer insights into factors contributing to the spread of misinformation accusations on social media platforms. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a corpus of 234,556 tweets about the 2020 US presidential election (Study 1) and 99,032 tweets about the 2022 US midterm elections (Study 2) to show how the sharing of misinformation accusations is explained by locomotion orientation. Findings The study findings indicate that the sharing of misinformation accusations is explained by writers' lower locomotion orientation, which is amplified among liberal tweet writers. Research limitations/implications Practitioners and policymakers can use the study findings to track and reduce the spread of misinformation accusations by developing algorithms to analyze the language of posts. A limitation of this research is that it focuses on political misinformation accusations. Future research in different contexts, such as vaccines, would be pertinent. Practical implications The authors show how social media firms can identify messages containing misinformation accusations with the potential to become viral by considering the tweet writer's locomotion language and geographical data. Social implications Early identification of messages containing misinformation accusations can help to improve the quality of the political conversation and electoral decision-making. Originality/value Strategies used by social media platforms to identify misinformation lack scale and perform poorly, making it important for social media platforms to manage misinformation accusations in an effort to retain trust. The authors identify linguistic and geographical factors that drive misinformation accusation retweets.

Authors 5

1. Ashish S. Galande

   Indian Institute of Management Udaipur

   Affiliation as printed

   Indian Institute of Management Udaipur, Udaipur, India

2. Frank Mathmann

   Queensland University of Technology

   Affiliation as printed

   Faculty of Business and Law, School of Advertising, Marketing and PR, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

3. Cesar Ariza-Rojas

   Queensland University of Technology

   Affiliation as printed

   Faculty of Business and Law, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

4. Benno Torgler

   Queensland University of Technology

   Affiliation as printed

   Faculty of Business and Law, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

5. Janina Garbas Aachen School of Business and Economics Chair of Marketing

   RWTH Aachen University

   Affiliation as printed

   School of Business and Economics, Chair of Marketing, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany