A

Insulators for 2D nanoelectronics: the gap to bridge

Nature Communications, vol. 11, pp. 3385

Abstract

Nanoelectronic devices based on 2D materials are far from delivering their full theoretical performance potential due to the lack of scalable insulators. Amorphous oxides that work well in silicon technology have ill-defined interfaces with 2D materials and numerous defects, while 2D hexagonal boron nitride does not meet required dielectric specifications. The list of suitable alternative insulators is currently very limited. Thus, a radically different mindset with respect to suitable insulators for 2D technologies may be required. We review possible solution scenarios like the creation of clean interfaces, production of native oxides from 2D semiconductors and more intensive studies on crystalline insulators.

Authors 11

  1. Yu. Yu. Illarionov corresponding

    TU Wien · Ioffe Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute for Microelectronics (TU Wien), Gusshausstrasse 27-29, 1040, Vienna, Austria. illarionov@iue.tuwien.ac.at

    Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, Polytechnicheskaya 26, St-Petersburg, Russia, 194021. illarionov@iue.tuwien.ac.at

    Institute for Microelectronics (TU Wien), Gusshausstrasse 27–29, 1040, Vienna, Austria

  2. TU Wien

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute for Microelectronics (TU Wien), Gusshausstrasse 27-29, 1040, Vienna, Austria

    Institute for Microelectronics (TU Wien), Gusshausstrasse 27–29, 1040, Vienna, Austria

  3. TU Wien

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute for Microelectronics (TU Wien), Gusshausstrasse 27-29, 1040, Vienna, Austria

    Institute for Microelectronics (TU Wien), Gusshausstrasse 27–29, 1040, Vienna, Austria

  4. Soochow University · Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Functional Nano & Soft Materials (FUNSOM), Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nanoscience and Technology, Soochow University, 199 Ren-Ai Road, Building 910, 215123, Suzhou, China

  5. The University of Texas at Austin

    Affiliation as printed

    The University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Rd. 160, Austin, TX, 78758, USA

  6. Ioffe Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Ioffe Physical-Technical Institute, Polytechnicheskaya 26, St-Petersburg, Russia, 194021

  7. TU Wien

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute for Photonics (TU Wien), Gusshausstrasse 27-29, 1040, Vienna, Austria

    Institute for Photonics (TU Wien), Gusshausstrasse 27–29, 1040, Vienna, Austria

  8. AMO (Germany) · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    AMO GmbH, Advanced Microelectronic Center Aachen (AMICA), Otto-Blumenthal-Str. 25, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    Chair of Electronic Devices, RWTH Aachen University, Otto-Blumenthal-Str. 2, 52074, Aachen, Germany

  9. University of Pisa

    Affiliation as printed

    Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione, Università di Pisa, 56122, Pisa, Italy

    Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione, Università di Pisa, 56122, Pisa, Italy

  10. Technische Universität Ilmenau

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute for Micro- and Nanoelectronics, Technical University Ilmenau, PF 100565, 98684, Ilmenau, Germany

  11. Tibor Grasser corresponding

    TU Wien

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute for Microelectronics (TU Wien), Gusshausstrasse 27-29, 1040, Vienna, Austria. grasser@iue.tuwien.ac.at

    Institute for Microelectronics (TU Wien), Gusshausstrasse 27–29, 1040, Vienna, Austria

Cited by 558 stored of 561

Cited by patents worldwide 3 (Lens.org)

References 177