A

Visual Cues in Exergame-like Feedback for Fitting Passive Upper Limbs Exoskeleton: Systematic Review, Usability and Users’ Preferences

Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1020–1026

Abstract

A key problem in the adoption of exoskeletons in industry is that workers are incorrectly fitting the device, leading to discomfort and suboptimal functioning of the exoskeleton. Although biomechanical modeling and design optimization strategies have tried to resolve this issue, we propose a user-centric, real-time fitting aid to guide and control the correct fitting process, which has not been achieved in practice. Inspired by previous work that uses exergame-like feedback to instruct a user, we compared augmented reality (AR)-based visual cues to guide the accurate fitting of a passive upper limb exoskeleton. We selected visual cues through a systematic literature review and evaluated their efficacy and usability for different aspects of exoskeleton fitting in a study with sixteen participants. The study outcome suggests a statistically significant preference for a semi-transparent overlay instead of a more abstract arrow-based method. Moreover, the results indicate high usability and satisfaction with our approach, improved user acceptance, and potentially enhanced fitting accuracy. These findings advance understanding of the viability of exergame-like real-time guidance as a means to increase exoskeleton acceptance and adoption in industrial settings.

Authors 7

  1. University of Cambridge

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Cambridge

  2. University of Cambridge

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Cambridge

  3. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University

  4. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University

  5. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University

  6. University of Cambridge

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Cambridge

  7. University of Cambridge

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Cambridge

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 48