Registered Report Stage I: Prioritizing sociability over morality: Preferring false empathic over truthful unempathic emotion communication
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 122, pp. 104833
Abstract
Literature on person perception suggests the primacy of morality over sociability in interactions. While theories of emotion highlight the importance of adhering to socially acceptable display rules, a contentious debate surrounds whether individuals prioritize moral or sociable communication of emotions. We investigated how people perceive and react to others who falsely communicate empathic versus truthfully communicate unempathic emotions related to others' (mis)fortunes. Through three preregistered studies, we examined participants' perceptions (sociability and morality) and behavioral reactions (in a Dictator Game) by employing various paradigms (vignette and retrospective recall) and situations (e.g., promotion and lottery). Consistently across our studies, we found that participants perceived targets who truthfully communicated unempathic emotions as higher on morality and lower on sociability compared to those who falsely communicated empathic emotions. Moreover, Studies 2 and 3 revealed that participants formed more favorable impressions of, and were more willing to interact with, the target who falsely communicated empathic emotions, as opposed to those who truthfully communicated unempathic emotions. This preference was explained by perceived morality and sociability attributed to the targets. Building on these findings, we propose two follow-up studies aimed at replicating our results and extending them to a laboratory setting – a Gamble Game where participants will directly encounter an actual (mis)fortune, and a Dictator Game with an allegedly real interaction partner. Our expected findings indicate that falsely communicating empathic emotions is favored over truthfully communicating unempathic emotions, suggesting the primacy of sociability over morality in the context of communicating emotions related to others' (mis)fortunes.
Authors 4
-
Leiden University · Durham University
Affiliation as printed
Department of Management and Marketing, Durham University Business School, the United Kingdom
Unit of Social, Economic and Organisational Psychology, Leiden University, the Netherlands
-
Leiden University · University of Edinburgh
Affiliation as printed
Neuropolitics Research Lab and Edinburgh Futures Institute, University of Edinburgh, the United Kingdom
Unit of Social, Economic and Organisational Psychology, Leiden University, the Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
Unit of Social, Economic and Organisational Psychology, Leiden University, the Netherlands
Cited by 1 stored of 1
1 result
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).