A

Comparative Analysis of Methods for Assessing On-Target Gene Editing Efficiencies

Methods and Protocols, vol. 8, pp. 23

Abstract

Genome editing based on CRISPR-derived technologies has become a cornerstone in both fundamental research and clinical applications. Accurately measuring editing efficiency is crucial for developing and applying genome editing strategies. This study offers a detailed comparison of widely used techniques for evaluating on-target gene editing efficiency, including T7 Endonuclease I (T7EI), Tracking of Indels by Decomposition (TIDE), Inference of CRISPR Edits (ICE), droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), and live-cell assays involving engineered fluorescent reporter cells. Through a comparative analysis, this study highlights the unique strengths and limitations of each method, aiding researchers in choosing the most appropriate method for their specific needs, ensuring more tailored monitoring of genome editing outcomes in a precise and reliable manner.

Authors 6

  1. Utrecht University · University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    Experimental Cardiology Laboratory, Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Regenerative Medicine Center Utrecht, Circulatory Health Research Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands

  2. University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    CDL Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Experimental Cardiology Laboratory, Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands

  3. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands

  4. University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    CDL Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands

  5. Utrecht University · University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    Experimental Cardiology Laboratory, Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Regenerative Medicine Center Utrecht, Circulatory Health Research Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands

  6. Zhiyong Lei corresponding

    Utrecht University · University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    CDL Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Experimental Cardiology Laboratory, Department of Cardiology, Division of Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Regenerative Medicine Center Utrecht, Circulatory Health Research Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, University Utrecht, 3584 CT Utrecht, The Netherlands

Cited by 5 stored of 5

5 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 40