A

Moisture-responsive root-branching pathways identified in diverse maize breeding germplasm

Science, vol. 387, pp. 666–673

Abstract

Plants grow complex root systems to extract unevenly distributed resources from soils. Spatial differences in soil moisture are perceived by root tips, leading to the patterning of new root branches toward available water in a process called hydropatterning. Little is known about hydropatterning behavior and its genetic basis in crop plants. Here, we developed an assay to measure hydropatterning in maize and revealed substantial differences between tropical/subtropical and temperate maize breeding germplasm that likely resulted from divergent selection. Genetic analysis of hydropatterning confirmed the regulatory role of auxin and revealed that the gaseous hormone ethylene locally inhibits root branching from air-exposed tissues. Our results demonstrate how distinct signaling pathways translate spatial patterns of water availability to developmental programs that determine root architecture.

Authors 15

  1. Stanford University

    Affiliation as printed

    Stanford University;

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

  2. Iowa State University

    Affiliation as printed

    Iowa State University;

    Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

  3. Stanford University

    Affiliation as printed

    Stanford University;

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

  4. Norwegian University of Life Sciences

    Affiliation as printed

    Norwegian University of Life Sciences;

    Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway

  5. Naturalis Biodiversity Center · University of Oslo

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Oslo;

    Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Naturalis Biodiversity Center, CR Leiden, Netherlands

  6. University of Nottingham

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Nottingham;

    Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK

  7. University of Nottingham

    Affiliation as printed

    Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK

  8. Stanford University

    Affiliation as printed

    Stanford University;

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

  9. Stanford University

    Affiliation as printed

    Stanford University;

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

  10. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Affiliation as printed

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

  11. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Affiliation as printed

    University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

  12. University of Nottingham

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Nottingham;

    Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK

  13. University of Nottingham

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Nottingham;

    Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK

  14. Iowa State University

    Affiliation as printed

    Iowa State University;

    Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA

  15. Howard Hughes Medical Institute · Stanford University

    Affiliation as printed

    Stanford University;

    Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

    Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Cited by 28 stored of 29

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 72