A

Validation of deep learning techniques for quality augmentation in diffusion MRI for clinical studies

NeuroImage Clinical, vol. 39, pp. 103483

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of deep learning (DL) techniques in improving the quality of diffusion MRI (dMRI) data in clinical applications. The study aims to determine whether the use of artificial intelligence (AI) methods in medical images may result in the loss of critical clinical information and/or the appearance of false information. To assess this, the focus was on the angular resolution of dMRI and a clinical trial was conducted on migraine, specifically between episodic and chronic migraine patients. The number of gradient directions had an impact on white matter analysis results, with statistically significant differences between groups being drastically reduced when using 21 gradient directions instead of the original 61. Fourteen teams from different institutions were tasked to use DL to enhance three diffusion metrics (FA, AD and MD) calculated from data acquired with 21 gradient directions and a b-value of 1000 s/mm2. The goal was to produce results that were comparable to those calculated from 61 gradient directions. The results were evaluated using both standard image quality metrics and Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) to compare episodic and chronic migraine patients. The study results suggest that while most DL techniques improved the ability to detect statistical differences between groups, they also led to an increase in false positive. The results showed that there was a constant growth rate of false positives linearly proportional to the new true positives, which highlights the risk of generalization of AI-based tasks when assessing diverse clinical cohorts and training using data from a single group. The methods also showed divergent performance when replicating the original distribution of the data and some exhibited significant bias. In conclusion, extreme caution should be exercised when using AI methods for harmonization or synthesis in clinical studies when processing heterogeneous data in clinical studies, as important information may be altered, even when global metrics such as structural similarity or peak signal-to-noise ratio appear to suggest otherwise.

Authors 44

  1. Universidad de Valladolid

    Affiliation as printed

    Laboratorio de Procesado de Imagen (LPI), ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain. Electronic address: sanaja@tel.uva.es

    Laboratorio de Procesado de Imagen (LPI), ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain

  2. Universidad de Valladolid

    Affiliation as printed

    Laboratorio de Procesado de Imagen (LPI), ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain

  3. Universidad de Valladolid · Cardiff University

    Affiliation as printed

    Laboratorio de Procesado de Imagen (LPI), ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain; Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC), School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

    Laboratorio de Procesado de Imagen (LPI), ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain

  4. University of Rochester

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Rochester, USA

  5. University of Rochester

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Rochester, USA

  6. University of Rochester

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Rochester, USA

  7. Affiliation as printed

    Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence, India

  8. Affiliation as printed

    Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence, India

  9. Affiliation as printed

    Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence, India

  10. Zhejiang University

    Affiliation as printed

    Zhejiang University, China

  11. Zhejiang University

    Affiliation as printed

    Zhejiang University, China

  12. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, UK

  13. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, UK

  14. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, UK

  15. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London, UK

  16. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging

    Affiliation as printed

    Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, USA

  17. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging

    Affiliation as printed

    Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, USA

  18. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging

    Affiliation as printed

    Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, USA

  19. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging

    Affiliation as printed

    Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, USA

  20. The University of Sydney

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Sydney, Australia

  21. The University of Sydney

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Sydney, Australia

  22. The University of Sydney

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Sydney, Australia

  23. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University, Germany

  24. University of Regensburg

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Regensburg, Germany

  25. Universidade de São Paulo

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

  26. Universidade de São Paulo

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

  27. Western University

    Affiliation as printed

    Western University, Canada

  28. Universidade de São Paulo

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

  29. University of Utah

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Utah, USA

  30. University of Utah

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Utah, USA

  31. Zhejiang University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Zhejiang University of Technology, China

  32. Zhejiang University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Zhejiang University of Technology, China

  33. Zhejiang University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Zhejiang University of Technology, China

  34. University of Iowa

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Iowa, USA

  35. University of Iowa

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Iowa, USA

  36. University of Iowa

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Iowa, USA

  37. New York University

    Affiliation as printed

    New York University, USA

  38. New York University

    Affiliation as printed

    New York University, USA

  39. New York University

    Affiliation as printed

    New York University, USA

  40. Tianjin University

    Affiliation as printed

    Tianjin University, China

  41. Tianjin University · University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Tianjin University, China

    University College London, UK

  42. Universidad de Valladolid

    Affiliation as printed

    Laboratorio de Procesado de Imagen (LPI), ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain

  43. Universidad de Valladolid

    Affiliation as printed

    Laboratorio de Procesado de Imagen (LPI), ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain

  44. Universidad de Valladolid

    Affiliation as printed

    Laboratorio de Procesado de Imagen (LPI), ETSI Telecomunicación, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain

Cited by 15 stored of 15

15 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 86