A

Benchmarking Orientation Distribution Function Estimation Methods for Tractometry in Single-Shell Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - An Evaluation of Test-Retest Reliability and Predictive Capability

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Abstract Deriving white matter (WM) bundles in-vivo has thus far mainly been applied in research settings, leveraging high angular resolution, multi-shell diffusion MRI (dMRI) acquisitions that enable advanced reconstruction methods. However, these advanced acquisitions are both time-consuming and costly to acquire. The ability to reconstruct WM bundles in the massive amounts of existing single-shelled, lower angular resolution data from legacy research studies and healthcare systems would offer much broader clinical applications and population-level generalizability. While legacy scans may offer a valuable, large-scale complement to contemporary research datasets, the reliability of white matter bundles derived from these scans remains unclear. Here, we leverage a large research dataset where each 64-direction dMRI scan was acquired as two independent 32-direction runs per subject. To investigate how recently developed bundle segmentation methods generalize to this data, we evaluated the test-retest reliability of the two 32-direction scans, of WM bundle extraction across three orientation distribution function (ODF) reconstruction methods: generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI), constrained spherical deconvolution (CSD), and single-shell three-tissue CSD (SS3T). We found that the majority of WM bundles could be reliably extracted from dMRI scans that were acquired using the 32-direction, single-shell acquisition scheme. The mean dice coefficient of reconstructed WM bundles was consistently higher within-subject than between-subject for all WM bundles and ODF reconstruction methods, illustrating preservation of person-specific anatomy. Further, when using features of the bundles to predict complex reasoning assessed using a computerized cognitive battery, we observed stable prediction accuracies ( r : 0.15-0.36) across the test-retest data. Among the three ODF reconstruction methods, SS3T had a good balance between sensitivity and specificity in external validation, a high intra-class correlation of extracted features, more plausible bundles, and strong predictive performance. More broadly, these results demonstrate that bundle segmentation can achieve robust performance even on lower angular resolution, single-shell dMRI, with particular advantages for ODF methods optimized for single-shell data. This highlights the considerable potential for dMRI collected in healthcare settings and legacy research datasets to accelerate and expand the scope of WM research.

Authors 19

  1. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Juelich;

    Forschungszentrum Juelich

  2. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  3. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  4. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  5. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  6. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  7. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  8. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  9. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  10. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Juelich;

    Forschungszentrum Juelich

  11. Kathrin Reetz Aachen

    RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University;

    RWTH Aachen University

  12. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  13. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  14. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Affiliation as printed

    Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia;

    Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia

  15. University of Pittsburgh

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pittsburgh

  16. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

    Affiliation as printed

    Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia;

    Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia

  17. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Juelich;

    Forschungszentrum Juelich

  18. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

  19. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pennsylvania;

    University of Pennsylvania

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 101