A behavioral view on responsibility attribution in multi‐level governance: Upward and downward responsibility attribution in response to performance below aspirations

Public Administration, vol. 101, pp. 1461–1480

Abstract

Abstract Multi‐level governance systems provide decision‐makers with many avenues for external responsibility attribution in response to lacking performance. This study provides a behavioral perspective that examines responsibility attribution to the national government (upward) and policy implementers (downward) as a function of performance relative to decision‐makers' aspiration levels. The study proposes that perceived accountability increases the propensity of external responsibility attribution, and that decision‐makers' political alignment to actors on other governance levels explains when responsibility is deflected upwards or downwards. Using a survey experiment that presents factual information on youth care overspending to 1086 elected local government officials, the study finds consistent evidence that performance below aspirations increases upward responsibility attribution. Accountability strengthens responsibility attribution for negative performance downward to policy implementers. Finally, responsibility is attributed upward less frequently by decision‐makers who are politically aligned with the national government, but information that signals performance below aspirations attenuates this tendency.

Authors 2

1. Joris van der Voet corresponding Aachen

   Leiden University

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands

   Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

2. Dovilė Rimkutė Aachen

   Leiden University

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands

   Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands