A

An OECD TG 428 study ring trial with 14C-Caffeine demonstrating repeatability and robustness of the dermal absorption in vitro method

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 132, pp. 105184

Abstract

finite dose) was investigated in six laboratories under Good Laboratory Practice conditions using an OECD TG 428-compliant in vitro assay with flow-through cells and split-thickness human skin. Potential sources of variation were reduced by a standardized protocol, test item and skin source. Particularly, skin samples from same donors were distributed over two repeats and between labs in a non-random, stratified design. Very similar recovery was achieved in the various assay compartments between laboratories, repeats and donors, demonstrating that the assay can be robustly and reliably performed. The absorption in one laboratory was 5-fold higher than in the others. This did not clearly correlate with skin integrity parameters but might be associated with an accidental COVID-19 pandemic-related interruption in sample shipment. It is possible that other factors may affect dermal absorption variation not routinely assessed or considered in the current method. The mean receptor fluid recovery, potential absorption (recovery in receptor fluid and skin except tape strips 1 and 2) and mass balance of caffeine was 6.99%, 7.14% and 99.13%, respectively, across all and 3.87%, 3.96% and 99.00% in the subset of five laboratories.

Authors 21

  1. Affiliation as printed

    ADAMA Deutschland GmbH, Cologne, Germany

  2. University of Surrey

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom

  3. Charles River Laboratories (Netherlands)

    Affiliation as printed

    Charles River Laboratories, Den Bosch, the Netherlands

  4. Charles River Laboratories (United Kingdom)

    Affiliation as printed

    Charles River Laboratories, Tranent, United Kingdom

  5. Charles River Laboratories (United Kingdom)

    Affiliation as printed

    Charles River Laboratories, Tranent, United Kingdom

  6. Pharmaron (United Kingdom)

    Affiliation as printed

    Pharmaron, Rushden, United Kingdom

  7. Affiliation as printed

    Jai Research Foundation, Valvada, India

  8. Corteva (United States)

    Affiliation as printed

    Corteva Agriscience, Newark, United States

  9. Corteva (United States)

    Affiliation as printed

    Corteva Agriscience, Newark, United States

  10. Corteva (United States)

    Affiliation as printed

    Corteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, United States

  11. Affiliation as printed

    Labcorp Drug Development, Harrogate, United Kingdom

  12. Eurofins (France)

    Affiliation as printed

    Eurofins Agroscience Services Chem SAS, Vergeze, France

  13. Syngenta (Switzerland)

    Affiliation as printed

    Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Basel, Switzerland

  14. Syngenta (Switzerland)

    Affiliation as printed

    Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Basel, Switzerland

  15. Corteva (United States)

    Affiliation as printed

    Corteva Agriscience, Indianapolis, United States

  16. Affiliation as printed

    Bayer SAS, Bayer Crop Science, Sophia, Antipolis, France

  17. Syngenta (Switzerland)

    Affiliation as printed

    Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Basel, Switzerland

  18. FMC (United States)

    Affiliation as printed

    FMC Corporation, Philadelphia, PA, USA

  19. Affiliation as printed

    ADAMA Deutschland GmbH, Cologne, Germany

  20. University of Surrey

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom

  21. Affiliation as printed

    BASF Österreich GmbH, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: christiane.wiemann@basf.com

Cited by 7 stored of 7

7 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 27