A

Task Learnability Modulates Surprise but Not Valence Processing for Reinforcement Learning in Probabilistic Choice Tasks

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 34, pp. 34–53

Abstract

The goal of temporal difference (TD) reinforcement learning is to maximize outcomes and improve future decision-making. It does so by utilizing a prediction error (PE), which quantifies the difference between the expected and the obtained outcome. In gambling tasks, however, decision-making cannot be improved because of the lack of learnability. On the basis of the idea that TD utilizes two independent bits of information from the PE (valence and surprise), we asked which of these aspects is affected when a task is not learnable. We contrasted behavioral data and ERPs in a learning variant and a gambling variant of a simple two-armed bandit task, in which outcome sequences were matched across tasks. Participants were explicitly informed that feedback could be used to improve performance in the learning task but not in the gambling task, and we predicted a corresponding modulation of the aspects of the PE. We used a model-based analysis of ERP data to extract the neural footprints of the valence and surprise information in the two tasks. Our results revealed that task learnability modulates reinforcement learning via the suppression of surprise processing but leaves the processing of valence unaffected. On the basis of our model and the data, we propose that task learnability can selectively suppress TD learning as well as alter behavioral adaptation based on a flexible cost-benefit arbitration.

Authors 6

  1. Leiden University · Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt

    Affiliation as printed

    Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany

    Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition

    Leiden University

  2. Jagiellonian University · Ghent University

    Affiliation as printed

    Ghent University

    Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

  3. Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt

    Affiliation as printed

    Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany

  4. Ghent University

    Affiliation as printed

    Ghent University

  5. Ghent University

    Affiliation as printed

    Ghent University

  6. Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt

    Affiliation as printed

    Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany

Cited by 10 stored of 11

10 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 92