A

Semi‐automated background removal limits data loss and normalizes imaging mass cytometry data

Cytometry Part A, vol. 99, pp. 1187–1197

Abstract

Imaging mass cytometry (IMC) allows the detection of multiple antigens (approximately 40 markers) combined with spatial information, making it a unique tool for the evaluation of complex biological systems. Due to its widespread availability and retained tissue morphology, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues are often a material of choice for IMC studies. However, antibody performance and signal to noise ratios can differ considerably between FFPE tissues as a consequence of variations in tissue processing, including fixation. In contrast to batch effects caused by differences in the immunodetection procedure, variations in tissue processing are difficult to control. We investigated the effect of immunodetection-related signal intensity fluctuations on IMC analysis and phenotype identification, in a cohort of 12 colorectal cancer tissues. Furthermore, we explored different normalization strategies and propose a workflow to normalize IMC data by semi-automated background removal, using publicly available tools. This workflow can be directly applied to previously acquired datasets and considerably improves the quality of IMC data, thereby supporting the analysis and comparison of multiple samples.

Authors 5

  1. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

    Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  2. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

    Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  3. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

    Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  4. Leiden University Medical Center · Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Computer Graphics and Visualization, EEMCS, TU Delft Delft The Netherlands

    Leiden Computational Biology Center Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

    Computer Graphics and Visualization, EEMCS, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands

    Leiden Computational Biology Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  5. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

    Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Cited by 50 stored of 47

Cited by patents worldwide 1 (Lens.org)

References 30