A

A perspective on component-level digital twins for surface marine propulsion system health monitoring: need and feasibility

Digital Twin

Abstract

Failures in marine propulsion systems pose significant safety and economic risks through loss-of-propulsion events. Although statistically infrequent, emerging maritime trends such as energy transition, alternative propulsion technologies, and Arctic navigation are expected to increase vulnerability to component failures, underscoring the need for advanced condition monitoring. This perspective article establishes component-level digital twins as an important but underexplored research direction. It introduces a scale-based characterisation of DTs from nano-level phenomena to process-level systems. It identifies the key barriers to practical implementation, including computational cost, dynamic modelling limitations, data scarcity and ownership constraints, communication challenges, and limited industry–academia collaboration. To address these gaps, the paper proposes the Digital Twin Research Hub (DTRH), a conceptual framework integrating risk-based prioritisation, physics-based modelling, surrogate modelling, and data-driven approaches. An experimentally validated bond graph-based simulation for torsional responses with placeholders for surrogate models is presented as an initiative. Finally, through a scholarly discussion, the study establishes the need for and feasibility of component-level DTs as an underexplored research direction for improving the reliability of marine propulsion systems through enhanced condition monitoring.

Authors 11

  1. Memorial University of Newfoundland · Aalto University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland

    Materials to Products Research Group, Department of EME, Aalto University

  2. Ghazanfar Mehdi corresponding

    Aalto University

    Affiliation as printed

    Energy Conversion and Systems Research Group, Department of EME, Aalto University

  3. Aalto University

    Affiliation as printed

    Mechatronics Research Group, Department of EME, Aalto University

  4. Aalto University

    Affiliation as printed

    Marine and Arctic Technology Research Group, Department of EME, Aalto University

  5. Aalto University

    Affiliation as printed

    Marine and Arctic Technology Research Group, Department of EME, Aalto University

  6. Aalto University

    Affiliation as printed

    Marine and Arctic Technology Research Group, Department of EME, Aalto University

  7. RWTH Aachen University · Aalto University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Metal Forming, RWTH Aachen University

    Materials to Products Research Group, Department of EME, Aalto University

  8. Memorial University of Newfoundland

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland

  9. Aalto University

    Affiliation as printed

    Energy Conversion and Systems Research Group, Department of EME, Aalto University

  10. Aalto University

    Affiliation as printed

    Materials to Products Research Group, Department of EME, Aalto University

  11. Aalto University

    Affiliation as printed

    Materials to Products Research Group, Department of EME, Aalto University

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 133