A

The SRG/eROSITA diffuse soft X-ray background

Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 714, pp. A85

Abstract

Context . The eROSITA bubbles (eRObub) were discovered in 2020 in the first SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey. They are some of the most extended structures in the X-ray sky. In projection, the eRObub encloses the γ -ray Fermi bubbles, and the northern eRObub appears to be bounded by the Loop I/North Polar Spur. Aims . Using eROSITA all-sky maps and spatially resolved spectra, we infer the three-dimensional structure and measure the hot gas properties of the eRObub. Methods . We fitted spectra binned to a constant signal-to-noise ratio and spectra with a high signal-to-noise ratio from custom regions to examine the gas properties in more detail. We fitted the morphology of eRObub using a parametrised geometrical model that describes a blast wave propagating from the Galactic Centre into an idealised Galactic halo. Results . The interior of the western eRObub is best characterised by two emission components with relatively uniform temperatures: a hotter component at kT = 0.60 ± 0.02keV, and a colder component at kT =0.21 −0.01 +0.03 keV, where the emission measure of the colder component is higher by about five times on average. Our spectra suggest sub-solar abundances (Z = 0.2 ± 0.1 Z ⊙ ), consistent with expectations for the Galactic halo. We found no conclusive evidence of α -element enhancement. In contrast, the abundances of the North Polar Spur are higher (Z > 0.5 Z ⊙ ). At face value, this disfavours a common origin. We spectrally confirmed an apparent cool shell at kT ~ 0.18−0.2keV surrounding the northern eRObub, assuming collisional ionisation equilibrium. We found no noticeable difference in X-ray emission in regions overlapping with the Fermi bubbles. Our geometrical model suggests that the horizontal size of the two eRObub is well constrained (semi-minor axis of ~6 kpc), but their vertical extent is uncertain because the observed X-ray emission is almost insensitive to the existence and location of a bubble cap. Additionally, a tilt (~30°) towards l ~ 220° is needed to reproduce the projected image of the northern eRObub, whereas the southern bubble requires a slight tilt.

Authors 18

  1. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  2. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

    Affiliation as printed

    Dr. Karl Remeis-Sternwarte and Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

  3. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  4. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  5. University of Insubria · Brera Astronomical Observatory · Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics · National Institute for Astrophysics

    Affiliation as printed

    Como Lake Centre for AstroPhysics (CLAP), DiSAT, Università dell’Insubria

    INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  6. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  7. Tsinghua University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Astronomy, Tsinghua University

  8. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

    Affiliation as printed

    Dr. Karl Remeis-Sternwarte and Erlangen Centre for Astroparticle Physics, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

  9. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  10. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  11. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics · Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  12. Tsinghua University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Astronomy, Tsinghua University

  13. Leiden University · Tokyo University of Science · RIKEN · Leiden Observatory · Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Science

    Leiden Observatory, Leiden University

    RIKEN High Energy Astrophysics Laboratory

    SRON Space Research Organisation Netherlands

  14. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  15. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  16. University of Science and Technology of China

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Astronomy, University of Science and Technology of China

    School of Astronomy and Space Science, University of Science and Technology of China

  17. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

  18. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik

Cited by 0 stored of 0

References 124