A

Recommendations for HLA Genotyping Data Standards and Clinical Laboratory Staffing Considerations

HLA, vol. 107, pp. e70725

Abstract

The rapid advances in HLA genotyping technology and the massive amounts of associated data have created a demand for better and more efficient laboratory data management practices. However, while some standards have been developed, there is a need for comprehensive guidelines that include all laboratory data-related processes such as messaging, storage and retention, documentation, reporting, validation and quality control. An important consideration in developing these recommendations is the feasibility of application in a laboratory setting without posing a substantial staff and cost burden for implementation and long-term maintenance and the availability of publicly available tools. This article presents evidence-based recommendations for multiple laboratory general data practices, focusing on HLA genotyping data and associated meta-data. These recommendations are compiled by experts in the fields of histocompatibility and immunogenetics (H&I) and representation from multiple H&I worldwide professional society leadership with the long-term goal of adopting these recommendations in future laboratory accreditation requirements.

Authors 9

  1. Eric Spierings corresponding

    University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    Laboratory for Translational Immunology and Central Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht the Netherlands

    Matchis Foundation Leiden the Netherlands

  2. University of Pennsylvania

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

  3. Affiliation as printed

    Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, NHS Blood & Transplant London UK

  4. Anthony Nolan · The Royal Free Hospital · University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Anthony Nolan Research Institute London UK

    Royal Free Hospital, University College London Cancer Institute London UK

  5. Qatar University

    Affiliation as printed

    Health Sector and College of Medicine, Qatar University Doha Qatar

  6. University of California San Diego

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology University of California San Diego California USA

  7. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

  8. National Marrow Donor Program

    Affiliation as printed

    CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), NMDP Minneapolis Minnesota USA

  9. Affiliation as printed

    MHC Therapeutics Bioconsulting Minneapolis Minnesota USA

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 25