A

Optimising entanglement distribution policies under classical communication constraints assisted by reinforcement learning

Machine Learning Science and Technology, vol. 6, pp. 035024

Abstract

Abstract Quantum repeaters play a crucial role in the effective distribution of entanglement over long distances. The nearest-future type of quantum repeater requires two operations: entanglement generation across neighbouring repeaters and entanglement swapping to promote short-range entanglement to long-range. For many hardware setups, these actions are probabilistic, leading to longer distribution times and incurred errors. Significant efforts have been vested in finding the optimal entanglement-distribution policy, i.e. the protocol specifying when a network node needs to generate or swap entanglement, such that the expected time to distribute long-distance entanglement is minimal. This problem is even more intricate in more realistic scenarios, especially when classical communication delays are taken into account. In this work, we formulate our problem as a Markov decision problem and use reinforcement learning (RL) to optimise over centralised strategies, where one designated node instructs other nodes which actions to perform. Contrary to most RL models, ours can be readily interpreted. Additionally, we introduce and evaluate a fixed local policy, the ‘predictive swap-asap’ policy, where nodes only coordinate with nearest neighbours. Compared to the straightforward generalisation of the common swap-asap policy to the scenario with classical communication effects, the ‘wait-for-broadcast swap-asap’ policy, both of the aforementioned entanglement-delivery policies are faster at high success probabilities. Our work showcases the merit of considering policies acting with incomplete information in the realistic case when classical communication effects are significant.

Authors 6

  1. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Instituut-Lorentz, Universiteit Leiden, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands

    〈aQaL〉 Applied Quantum Algorithms, Leiden, The Netherlands

  2. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center · QuTech · Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    EEMCS, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 4, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands

    LIACS, Universiteit Leiden, Niels Bohrweg 1, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands

    QuTech, Delft University of Technology, Lorentzweg 1, 2628 CJ Delft, The Netherlands

    〈aQaL〉 Applied Quantum Algorithms, Leiden, The Netherlands

  3. Leiden University · Universität Ulm · Leiden University Medical Center · Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology (IQST), Ulm-Stuttgart, Germany

    Institute for Complex Quantum Systems, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany

    Instituut-Lorentz, Universiteit Leiden, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands

    〈aQaL〉 Applied Quantum Algorithms, Leiden, The Netherlands

  4. University of Massachusetts Amherst

    Affiliation as printed

    Manning College of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, 140 Governors Dr, Amherst, MA 01002, United States of America

  5. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Instituut-Lorentz, Universiteit Leiden, Niels Bohrweg 2, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands

    〈aQaL〉 Applied Quantum Algorithms, Leiden, The Netherlands

  6. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    LIACS, Universiteit Leiden, Niels Bohrweg 1, 2333 CA Leiden, The Netherlands

    〈aQaL〉 Applied Quantum Algorithms, Leiden, The Netherlands

Cited by 1 stored of 1

1 result

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 50