A

An ASTCT, CIBMTR, EBMT, and APBMT Consensus Statement Defining Response Criteria for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy (TA-TMA) Directed Therapy

Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, vol. 31, pp. 610–623

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transplant associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) confers significant morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. The safety and efficacy of multiple TA-TMA directed therapeutic agents are being tested in ongoing clinical trials. In the absence of approved drugs, several treatments are used off-label. Response definitions to TA-TMA directed therapy from retrospective studies and ongoing interventional clinical trials vary widely, limiting cross study comparisons. An expert panel from multiple international blood and marrow transplant societies (ASTCT, CIBMTR, EBMT, APBMT) who initially convened to harmonize diagnostic and risk stratification criteria for TA-TMA extended its mandate to review response criteria. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to propose clinically meaningful response criteria for TA-TMA directed therapy to enhance consistent evaluation of therapeutic agents in clinical practice, interventional trials, and registry studies. METHODS: After a relevant literature review, the Delphi method was used to achieve consensus on proposed response criteria. RESULTS: The panel focused on the 3 key concepts. First, due to ongoing concurrent co-morbidities and severity of illness, the complete resolution of TA-TMA manifestations may be difficult to achieve immediately after initiating treatment, making the definition of clinically meaningful partial responses essential to assess early efficacy of TA-TMA-directed therapies. Second, because hematologic manifestations may resolve faster than organ damage, we suggest assessing hematologic/biochemical and organ manifestations independently, in addition to having an overall response assessment. Finally, using the previously established diagnostic criteria as a framework, we propose objective response definitions for each TA-TMA criterion and organ manifestation. While consensus was achieved on response definitions, due to the lack of evidence, there was no agreement on standardized time points for assessing response or when to consider alternative therapies for patients unresponsive to initial treatments. Hematologic and biochemical response assessments include anemia and thrombocytopenia, with criteria accounting for transfusion dependence or independence at the time of treatment, schistocytes, lactate dehydrogenase, and soluble C5b-9. Patients with other established etiologies of cytopenias (i.e. poor graft function or relapsed hematologic malignancy) should be considered unevaluable for hematologic response. Responses for involved organ manifestations were also proposed. In an overall assessment, the best overall response is limited by the lowest hematologic/biochemical or organ response. NR of either hematologic/biochemical or organ is considered an overall NR. CONCLUSION: The consensus response criteria proposed by this expert panel are a step towards standardizing the assessment of treatment responses of TA-TMA directed agents for future studies and interventional clinical trials. Adoption of these criteria will enhance consistency of response assessment and facilitate the comparison of TA-TMA treatments. Since achieving an early overall CR may be challenging/protracted in patients with organ injury; establishment of criteria for clinically meaningful PR is important and may be a more useful early endpoint in studies. Given the complexity of these patients and assessment of response, these definitions may need be revised in the future after application in large cohorts diverse in age, HCT approaches, and interventional agents.

Authors 19

  1. Emory University · Children's Healthcare of Atlanta

    Affiliation as printed

    Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia

  2. G. Papanikolaou General Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Hematology Department, G Papanikoloaou Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece

  3. Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Hematology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain

  4. Affiliation as printed

    Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic Blood and Marrow Transplantation Center, Seoul, Korea

  5. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Immune Deficiency, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio

  6. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

  7. Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Division of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Immune Deficiency, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio

  8. Affiliation as printed

    RM Gorbacheva Research Institute, Pavlov University, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

  9. European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    Affiliation as printed

    European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Executive Office, Barcelona, Spain

  10. Christian Medical College, Vellore

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Haematology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India

  11. The Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

    Affiliation as printed

    Japanese Data Center for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Nagoya, Japan

  12. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

  13. The Ohio State University

    Affiliation as printed

    Division of Hematology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

  14. Karolinska University Hospital

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Cellular Therapy and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden

  15. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

  16. Medical College of Wisconsin

    Affiliation as printed

    Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

  17. Institut Català d'Oncologia

    Affiliation as printed

    Clinical Hematology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia-Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain

  18. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts

  19. Sumithira Vasu corresponding

    The Ohio State University

    Affiliation as printed

    Division of Hematology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: Sumithira.Vasu@osumc.edu

Cited by 13 stored of 13

13 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 61