Challenges in applying large language models to requirements engineering tasks
Design Science, vol. 10
Abstract
Abstract Growth in the complexity of advanced systems is mirrored by a growth in the number of engineering requirements and related upstream and downstream tasks. These requirements are typically expressed in natural language and require human expertise to manage. Natural language processing (NLP) technology has long been seen as promising to increase requirements engineering (RE) productivity but has yet to demonstrate substantive benefits. The recent addition of large language models (LLMs) to the NLP toolbox is now generating renewed enthusiasm in the hope that it will overcome past shortcomings. This article scrutinizes this claim by reviewing the application of LLMs for engineering requirements tasks. We survey the success of applying LLMs and the scale to which they have been used. We also identify groups of challenges shared across different engineering requirement tasks. These challenges show how this technology has been applied to RE tasks that need reassessment. We finalize by drawing a parallel to other engineering fields with similar challenges and how they have been overcome in the past – and suggest these as future directions to be investigated.
Authors 6
-
Johannes J. Norheim corresponding
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Affiliation as printed
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
-
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Affiliation as printed
Sociotechnical Systems Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
-
Affiliation as printed
Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering (WZL), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
-
Affiliation as printed
Laboratory for Machine Tools and Production Engineering (WZL), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
-
Affiliation as printed
Airbus, Toulouse, France
-
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Affiliation as printed
Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
Cited by 61 stored of 61
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).