Practical considerations to optimize aquatic testing of particulate material, with focus on nanomaterials

Environmental Science Nano, vol. 11, pp. 2352–2371

Abstract

Following available approaches included e.g. , in existing OECD Test Guidelines and Guidance Documents for the aquatic testing of particulate materials such as nanomaterials and microplastics leads to various challenges to be considered.

Authors 8

1. Simon Luederwald corresponding

   BASF (Germany)

   Affiliation as printed

   Experimental Ecology, BASF SE, Carl-Bosch-Strasse 38, 67056 Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany

2. Teresa F. Fernandes

   Heriot-Watt University

   Affiliation as printed

   Institute of Life and Earth Sciences, Heriot Watt University, The Avenue, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK

3. Antonia Praetorius

   University of Amsterdam

   Affiliation as printed

   Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, Netherlands

4. Jacques‐Aurélien Sergent

   Solvay (Belgium)

   Affiliation as printed

   Toxicological and Environmental Risk Assessment Unit, Solvay SA, 1120 Brussels, Belgium

5. Kristi Tatsi

   Corteva (United States)

   Affiliation as printed

   Corteva Agriscience UK Ltd., 101 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, OX14 4RY, UK

6. Joan G. Tell
   Affiliation as printed

   Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ, USA

7. Niels Timmer Aachen Charles River Laboratories Den Bosch BV

   Charles River Laboratories (Netherlands)

   Affiliation as printed

   Charles River Laboratories Den Bosch BV, Hambakenwetering 7, 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands

8. Stephan Wagner

   Hochschule Fresenius

   Affiliation as printed

   Hochschule Fresenius, Institute for Analytical Research, Limburger Str. 2, 65510 Idstein, Germany