A

A multi-dimensional analysis of usage counts, Mendeley readership, and citations for journal and conference papers

Scientometrics, vol. 129, pp. 985–1013

Abstract

This study analyzed 16,799 journal papers and 98,773 conference papers published by IEEE Xplore in 2016 to investigate the relationships among usage counts, Mendeley readership, and citations through descriptive, regression, and mediation analyses. Differences in the relationship among these metrics between journal and conference papers are also studied. Results showed that there is no significant difference between journal and conference papers in the distribution patterns and accumulation rates of the three metrics. However, the correlation coefficients of the interrelationships between the three metrics were lower in conference papers compared to journal papers. Secondly, funding, international collaboration, and open access are positively associated with all three metrics, except for the case of funding on the usage metrics of conference papers. Furthermore, early Mendeley readership is a better predictor of citations than early usage counts and performs better for journal papers. Finally, we reveal that early Mendeley readership partially mediates between early usage counts and citation counts in the journal and conference papers. The main difference is that conference papers rely more on the direct effect of early usage counts on citations. This study contributes to expanding the existing knowledge on the relationships among usage counts, Mendeley readership, and citations in journal and conference papers, providing new insights into the relationship between the three metrics through mediation analysis.

Authors 4

  1. Dalian University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    WISE Lab, Institute of Science of Science and S&T Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

  2. Leiden University · Renmin University of China

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

    School of Information Resource Management, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China

  3. Xianwen Wang corresponding

    Dalian University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    WISE Lab, Institute of Science of Science and S&T Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

  4. Leiden University · Stellenbosch University

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

    DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Scientometrics and Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Cited by 18 stored of 19

18 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 75