A

Dissecting the Complexities of Learning With Infinite Hidden Markov Models

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Abstract Learning to exploit the contingencies of a complex experiment is not an easy task for animals. Individuals learn in an idiosyncratic manner, revising their approaches multiple times as they are shaped, or shape themselves, and potentially end up with different strategies. Their long-run learning curves are therefore a tantalizing target for the sort of individualized quantitative characterizations that sophisticated modelling can provide. However, any such model requires a flexible and extensible structure which can capture radically new behaviours as well as slow changes in existing ones. To this end, we suggest a dynamic input-output infinite hidden semi-Markov model, whose latent states are associated with specific components of behaviour. This model includes an infinite number of potential states and so has the capacity to describe substantially new behaviours by unearthing extra states; while dynamics in the model allow it to capture more modest adaptations to existing behaviours. We individually fit the model to data collected from more than 100 mice as they learned a contrast detection task over tens of sessions and around fifteen thousand trials each. Despite large individual differences, we found that most animals progressed through three major stages of learning, the transitions between which were marked by distinct additions to task understanding. We furthermore showed that marked changes in behaviour are much more likely to occur at the very beginning of sessions, i.e. after a period of rest, and that response biases in earlier stages are not predictive of biases later on in this task.

Authors 12

  1. Sebastian A. Bruijns corresponding

    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics · University of Tübingen

    Affiliation as printed

    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics

    University of Tübingen

    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany

    University of Tübingen, Germany

  2. Champalimaud Foundation

    Affiliation as printed

    Champalimaud Foundation

    Champalimaud Foundation, Portugal

  3. Champalimaud Foundation

    Affiliation as printed

    Champalimaud Foundation

    Champalimaud Foundation, Portugal

  4. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London

    University College London, United Kingdom

  5. Champalimaud Foundation

    Affiliation as printed

    Champalimaud Foundation

    Champalimaud Foundation, Portugal

  6. Sainsbury Wellcome Centre · University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Sainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London

    Sainsbury Wellcome Centre, University College London, United Kingdom

  7. New York University

    Affiliation as printed

    New York University

    New York University, USA

  8. Princeton University

    Affiliation as printed

    Princeton University

    Princeton University, USA

  9. University of Washington

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Washington

    University of Washington, USA

  10. University College London

    Affiliation as printed

    University College London

    University College London, United Kingdom

  11. Anne E Urai Aachen

    Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University

    Leiden University, The Netherlands

  12. Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics · University of Tübingen

    Affiliation as printed

    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics

    University of Tübingen

    Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany

    University of Tübingen, Germany

Cited by 9 stored of 9

9 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 52