Can the low-redshift Lyman alpha forest constrain AGN feedback models?

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 527, pp. 4545–4562

Abstract

ABSTRACT We investigate the potential of low-redshift Lyman alpha (Lyα) forest for constraining active galactic nuclei (AGNs) feedback models by analysing the Illustris and IllustrisTNG simulation at z = 0.1. These simulations are ideal for studying the impact of AGN feedback on the intergalactic medium (IGM) as they share initial conditions with significant differences in the feedback prescriptions. Both simulations reveal that the IGM is significantly impacted by AGN feedback. Specifically, feedback is stronger in Illustris and results in reducing cool baryon fraction to 23 per cent relative to 39 per cent in IllustrisTNG. However, when comparing various statistics of Lyα forest such as 2D and marginalized distributions of Doppler widths and H i column density, line density, and flux power spectrum with real data, we find that most of these statistics are largely insensitive to the differences in feedback models. This lack of sensitivity arises because of the fundamental degeneracy between the fraction of cool baryons and the H i photoionization rate (ΓHI) as their product determines the optical depth of the Lyα forest. Since the ΓHI cannot be precisely predicted from first principles, it needs to be treated as a nuisance parameter adjusted to match the observed Lyα line density. After adjusting ΓHI, the distinctions in the considered statistics essentially fade away. Only the Lyα flux power spectrum at small spatial scales exhibits potentially observable differences, although this may be specific to the relatively extreme feedback model employed in Illustris. Without independent constraints on either ΓHI or cool baryon fraction, constraining AGN feedback with low-redshift Lyα forest will be very challenging.

Authors 5

1. Vikram Khaire corresponding

   University of California, Santa Barbara · Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology

   Affiliation as printed

   Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram , Kerala 695547 , India

   Physics Department, Broida Hall, University of California Santa Barbara , Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9530 , USA

2. Teng Hu

   University of California, Santa Barbara

   Affiliation as printed

   Physics Department, Broida Hall, University of California Santa Barbara , Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9530 , USA

3. Joseph F. Hennawi Aachen Leiden Observatory

   Leiden University · University of California, Santa Barbara · Leiden Observatory

   Affiliation as printed

   Leiden Observatory, Leiden University , PO Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands

   Physics Department, Broida Hall, University of California Santa Barbara , Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9530 , USA

4. Michael R. Walther

   Excellence Cluster Origins · Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

   Affiliation as printed

   Excellence Cluster ORIGINS , Boltzmannstrasse 2, D-85748 Garching , Germany

   Faculty of Physics, University Observatory, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität , Scheinerstr. 1, D-81677 München , Germany

5. Frederick B. Davies

   University of California, Santa Barbara · Max Planck Institute for Astronomy

   Affiliation as printed

   Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie , Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg , Germany

   Physics Department, Broida Hall, University of California Santa Barbara , Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9530 , USA