A

Negative controls: Concepts and caveats

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, vol. 32, pp. 1576–1587

Abstract

Unmeasured confounding is a well-known obstacle in causal inference. In recent years, negative controls have received increasing attention as a important tool to address concerns about the problem. The literature on the topic has expanded rapidly and several authors have advocated the more routine use of negative controls in epidemiological practice. In this article, we review concepts and methodologies based on negative controls for detection and correction of unmeasured confounding bias. We argue that negative controls may lack both specificity and sensitivity to detect unmeasured confounding and that proving the null hypothesis of a null negative control association is impossible. We focus our discussion on the control outcome calibration approach, the difference-in-difference approach, and the double-negative control approach as methods for confounding correction. For each of these methods, we highlight their assumptions and illustrate the potential impact of violations thereof. Given the potentially large impact of assumption violations, it may sometimes be desirable to replace strong conditions for exact identification with weaker, easily verifiable conditions, even when these imply at most partial identification of unmeasured confounding. Future research in this area may broaden the applicability of negative controls and in turn make them better suited for routine use in epidemiological practice. At present, however, the applicability of negative controls should be carefully judged on a case-by-case basis.

Authors 2

  1. University Medical Center Utrecht · Utrecht University

    Affiliation as printed

    Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  2. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

Cited by 11 stored of 11

11 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 17

17 results