A

Using preregistration as a tool for transparent fNIRS study design

Neurophotonics, vol. 10, pp. 1–26

Abstract

Significance: The expansion of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) methodology and analysis tools gives rise to various design and analytical decisions that researchers have to make. Several recent efforts have developed guidelines for preprocessing, analyzing, and reporting practices. For the planning stage of fNIRS studies, similar guidance is desirable. Study preregistration helps researchers to transparently document study protocols before conducting the study, including materials, methods, and analyses, and thus, others to verify, understand, and reproduce a study. Preregistration can thus serve as a useful tool for transparent, careful, and comprehensive fNIRS study design. Aim: We aim to create a guide on the design and analysis steps involved in fNIRS studies and to provide a preregistration template specified for fNIRS studies. Approach: The presented preregistration guide has a strong focus on fNIRS specific requirements, and the associated template provides examples based on continuous-wave (CW) fNIRS studies conducted in humans. These can, however, be extended to other types of fNIRS studies. Results: On a step-by-step basis, we walk the fNIRS user through key methodological and analysis-related aspects central to a comprehensive fNIRS study design. These include items specific to the design of CW, task-based fNIRS studies, but also sections that are of general importance, including an in-depth elaboration on sample size planning. Conclusions: Our guide introduces these open science tools to the fNIRS community, providing researchers with an overview of key design aspects and specification recommendations for comprehensive study planning. As such it can be used as a template to preregister fNIRS studies or merely as a tool for transparent fNIRS study design.

Authors 8

  1. University of Tübingen

    Affiliation as printed

    Eberhard Karls Univ. Tübingen

    Equal contribution and in randomized order

    University of Tuebingen, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Tuebingen, Germany

  2. Christina Artemenko corresponding

    University of Tübingen

    Affiliation as printed

    Eberhard Karls Univ. Tübingen

    Equal contribution and in randomized order

    University of Tuebingen, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Science, Tuebingen, Germany

  3. Jessica Elizabeth Kosie corresponding

    Princeton University

    Affiliation as printed

    Princeton Univ

    Equal contribution and in randomized order

    Princeton University, Social and Natural Sciences, Department of Psychology, Princeton, New Jersey, United States

  4. Helena M. Cockx corresponding

    Radboud University Nijmegen · Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour

    Affiliation as printed

    Radboud Univ. Nijmegen

    Equal contribution and in randomized order

    Radboud University, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Biophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  5. Katharina Stute corresponding

    Chemnitz University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Technische Univ. Chemnitz

    Chemnitz University of Technology, Institute of Human Movement Science and Health, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, Chemnitz, Germany

    Equal contribution and in randomized order

  6. João Pereira corresponding

    University of Coimbra

    Affiliation as printed

    Univ. de Coimbra

    Equal contribution and in randomized order

    University of Coimbra, Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research, Coimbra, Portugal

  7. Franziska Klein corresponding Aachen

    Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Carl von Ossietzky Univ. Oldenburg

    Equal contribution and in randomized order

    RWTH Aachen Univ. (Germany)

    University of Oldenburg, Department of Psychology, Neurocognition and functional Neurorehabilitation Group, Oldenburg (Oldb), Germany

  8. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen Univ

    Equal contribution and in randomized order

    RWTH Aachen University, Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Aachen, Germany

Cited by 37 stored of 33

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 184