A

Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery: Is There a Need for Standardization? Results of a Nationwide Survey

Breast Care, vol. 18, pp. 90–96

Abstract

Introduction: The NABON Breast Cancer Audit showed that more than 70% of the Dutch women undergoing surgery for breast cancer maintained their breast contour by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or by immediate reconstruction after ablative surgery. The proportion of oncoplastic surgery applied in patients undergoing breast-conserving treatment remains unknown. The aim of our study was to assess the need for standardization of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS) in an attempt to enable measurement of the quality of OPBCS. Methods: = 134). Results: A total of 60 breast surgeons, representing different hospitals in The Netherlands, responded. 61.7% of the breast surgeons performed BCS on 60-100% of their patients. 68.3% responded that BCS was performed using OPS techniques in up to 40% of their patients. OPBCS was defined as level I volume displacement by 45.2% of the breast surgeons and as BCS performed by a breast surgeon and plastic surgeon together by 32.3% of the breast surgeons. 94.5% indicated that there is a need for standardization of the definition of OPBCS in The Netherlands. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that OPBCS is a major part of daily clinical practice of Dutch breast surgeons treating BC patients. Despite this, there is no clear definition of OPS in breast-conserving treatment in The Netherlands. Only after standardization can a classification code and quality indicator be initiated for OPBCS. Ultimately, this will facilitate improvement in quality of BC care.

Authors 7

  1. The Netherlands Cancer Institute · Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgical oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands

  2. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgical oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  3. Amsterdam University Medical Centers

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiation Oncology, AmsterdamUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  4. Leiden University Medical Center · The Netherlands Cancer Institute · Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Department of Surgical oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands

  5. Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgical Oncology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

  6. The Netherlands Cancer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  7. The Netherlands Cancer Institute · Amsterdam University Medical Centers

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, AmsterdamUMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Department of Surgical oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Cited by 10 stored of 10

10 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 42