A

Arterial spin labeling using spatio‐temporal encoding readout for robust perfusion imaging in inhomogenous magnetic fields

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 89, pp. 1092–1101

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of spatio-temporal encoding (SPEN) readout for pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) in brain, and its robustness to susceptibility artifacts as introduced by aneurysm clips. METHODS: ) was varied and, the aneurysm clip-induced artifact was evaluated in phantom (label-images) as well as in vivo (perfusion-weighted signal (PWS)-maps and temporal SNR (tSNR)). In vivo results were compared to gradient-echo EPI (GE-EPI) and spin-echo EPI (SE-EPI). The dependence of tSNR on TR was evaluated separately for SPEN and SE-EPI. SPEN with Q ˜ 75 encodes with the same off-resonance robustness as EPI. RESULTS: The clip-induced artifact with SPEN decreased with increase in Q, and was smaller compared to SE-EPI and GE-EPI in vivo. tSNR decreased with Q and the tSNR of GE-EPI and SE-EPI corresponded to SPEN with a Q-value of approximately ˜85 and ˜108, respectively. In addition, SPEN perfusion images showed a higher tSNR (p < 0.05) for TR = 4000 ms compared to TR = 2100 ms, while SE-EPI did not. tSNR remained relatively stable when the time between SPEN-excitation and start of the next labeling-module was more than ˜1000 ms. CONCLUSION: Feasibility of combining SPEN with pCASL imaging was demonstrated, enabling cerebral perfusion measurements with a higher robustness to field inhomogeneity (Q > 75) compared to SE-EPI and GE-EPI. However, the SPEN chirp-pulse saturates incoming blood, thereby reducing pCASL labeling efficiency of the next acquisition for short TRs. Future developments are needed to enable 3D scanning.

Authors 6

  1. Leiden University Medical Center · University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

    Center for Image Sciences University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

    C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  2. University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    Center for Image Sciences University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

    Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  3. Weizmann Institute of Science

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Chemical and Biological Physics Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot Israel

    Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel

  4. University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiotherapy University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

    Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  5. Leiden University · Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands

    Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands

    C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

  6. Clemens Bos corresponding

    University Medical Center Utrecht

    Affiliation as printed

    Center for Image Sciences University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands

    Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Cited by 3 stored of 3

3 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 41