A

Bihormonal Artificial Pancreas With Closed-Loop Glucose Control vs Current Diabetes Care After Total Pancreatectomy

JAMA Surgery, vol. 157, pp. 950

Abstract

Importance: Glucose control in patients after total pancreatectomy is problematic because of the complete absence of α- and β-cells, leading to impaired quality of life. A novel, bihormonal artificial pancreas (BIHAP), using both insulin and glucagon, may improve glucose control, but studies in this setting are lacking. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of the BIHAP in patients after total pancreatectomy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized crossover clinical trial compared the fully closed-loop BIHAP with current diabetes care (ie, insulin pump or pen therapy) in 12 adult outpatients after total pancreatectomy. Patients were recruited between August 21 and November 16, 2020. This first-in-patient study began with a feasibility phase in 2 patients. Subsequently, 12 patients were randomly assigned to 7-day treatment with the BIHAP (preceded by a 5-day training period) followed by 7-day treatment with current diabetes care, or the same treatments in reverse order. Statistical analysis was by Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann-Whitney U tests, with significance set at a 2-sided P < .05. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in euglycemia (70-180 mg/dL [3.9-10 mmol/L]) as assessed by continuous glucose monitoring. Results: In total, 12 patients (7 men and 3 women; median [IQR] age, 62.5 [43.1-74.0] years) were randomly assigned, of whom 3 did not complete the BIHAP phase and 1 was replaced. The time spent in euglycemia was significantly higher during treatment with the BIHAP (median, 78.30%; IQR, 71.05%-82.61%) than current diabetes care (median, 57.38%; IQR, 52.38%-81.35%; P = .03). In addition, the time spent in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]) was lower with the BIHAP (median, 0.00% [IQR, 0.00%-0.07%] vs 1.61% [IQR, 0.80%-3.81%]; P = .004). No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients using the BIHAP after total pancreatectomy experienced an increased percentage of time in euglycemia and a reduced percentage of time in hypoglycemia compared with current diabetes care, without apparent safety risks. Larger randomized trials, including longer periods of treatment and an assessment of quality of life, should confirm these findings. Trial Registration: trialregister.nl Identifier: NL8871.

Authors 18

  1. St. Antonius Ziekenhuis · Amsterdam University Medical Centers · Cancer Center Amsterdam · University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands

  2. Amsterdam University Medical Centers · Cancer Center Amsterdam · University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

  3. Amsterdam University Medical Centers · Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism · University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Amsterdam UMC, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Inreda Diabetic, Goor, the Netherlands

  4. Affiliation as printed

    Inreda Diabetic, Goor, the Netherlands

  5. Affiliation as printed

    Inreda Diabetic, Goor, the Netherlands

  6. Medisch Spectrum Twente

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands

  7. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands

  8. Maasstad Ziekenhuis

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

  9. Radboud University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands

  10. Erasmus MC

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

  11. University Medical Center Utrecht · St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Research and Development, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands

    Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands

  12. Erasmus MC

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

  13. Amsterdam University Medical Centers · Cancer Center Amsterdam · University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

  14. Amsterdam University Medical Centers · Cancer Center Amsterdam · University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

  15. Amsterdam University Medical Centers · Cancer Center Amsterdam · University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

  16. Amsterdam University Medical Centers · Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism · University of Amsterdam

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Amsterdam UMC, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

  17. Affiliation as printed

    for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group

  18. Affiliation as printed

    for the Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group

Cited by 40 stored of 40

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 28