A

The Societal Readiness Thinking Tool: A Practical Resource for Maturing the Societal Readiness of Research Projects

Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 28, pp. 6

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the Societal Readiness (SR) Thinking Tool to aid researchers and innovators in developing research projects with greater responsiveness to societal values, needs, and expectations. The need for societally-focused approaches to research and innovation-complementary to Technology Readiness (TR) frameworks-is presented. Insights from responsible research and innovation (RRI) concepts and practice, organized across critical stages of project-life cycles are discussed with reference to the development of the SR Thinking Tool. The tool is designed to complement not only shortfalls in TR approaches, but also improve upon other efforts to integrate RRI, sustainability, and design thinking in research and innovation cycles. Operationalization and early-stage user tests of the Tool are reported, along with discussion of potential future iterations and applications.

Authors 15

  1. Michael J. Bernstein corresponding

    AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH · Arizona State University

    Affiliation as printed

    AIT, Austrian Institute of Technology, GmbH, Vienna, Austria. michael.bernstein@ait.ac.at

    School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA. michael.bernstein@ait.ac.at

    AIT, Austrian Institute of Technology, GmbH, Vienna, Austria

  2. University of Copenhagen

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Sociology, University of Copenhagen, København, Denmark

  3. Aarhus University

    Affiliation as printed

    Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark

  4. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

  5. Aarhus University

    Affiliation as printed

    Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark

  6. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

  7. Institut für Höhere Studien - Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS)

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria

  8. Tilburg University · Stellenbosch University · University of Chicago

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Research on Evaluation, Science and Technology and the DST-NRF Centre for Excellence in Scientometrics and Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

    Department of Organization Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands

    Knowledge Lab, Department of Sociology, Division of the Social Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

  9. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

  10. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

  11. Delft University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

  12. Aarhus University

    Affiliation as printed

    Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark

  13. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

    Affiliation as printed

    VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland

  14. Wageningen University & Research

    Affiliation as printed

    Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands

  15. Aarhus University

    Affiliation as printed

    Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark

Cited by 44 stored of 44

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 74