A

How do atomic code uncertainties affect abundance measurements in the intracluster medium?

Astronomische Nachrichten, vol. 341, pp. 203–209

Abstract

Abstract Accurate chemical abundance measurements of X‐ray‐emitting atmospheres pervading massive galaxies, galaxy groups, and clusters provide essential information on the star formation and chemical enrichment histories of these large‐scale structures. Although the collisionally ionized nature of the intracluster medium (ICM) makes these abundance measurements relatively easy, the underlying spectral models can rely on different atomic codes, which brings additional uncertainties on the inferred abundances. Here we provide a simple, yet comprehensive comparison between the codes SPEXACT v3.0.5 (ciemodel) and AtomDB v3.0.9 (vapecmodel) in the case of moderate, charged‐coupled device‐like resolution spectroscopy. We show that in cool plasmas (kT ≲ 2 keV), systematic differences up to ∼20% for the Fe abundance and ∼45% for the O/Fe, Mg/Fe, Si/Fe, and S/Fe ratios may still occur. Importantly, these discrepancies are also found to be instrument‐dependent, at least for the absolute Fe abundance. Future improvements in these two codes will be necessary to better address questions on ICM enrichment.

Authors 9

  1. Eötvös Loránd University · Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Physics Eötvös University Budapest Hungary

    MTA‐Eötvös University Lendület Hot Universe Research Group Budapest Hungary

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research Utrecht The Netherlands

    Institute of Physics Eötvös University Budapest Hungary

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research Utrecht The Netherlands

  2. Eötvös Loránd University · Hiroshima University · Masaryk University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic

    MTA‐Eötvös University Lendület Hot Universe Research Group Budapest Hungary

    School of Science Hiroshima University Higashi‐Hiroshima Japan

    School of Science Hiroshima University Higashi‐Hiroshima Japan

  3. Eötvös Loránd University

    Affiliation as printed

    MTA‐Eötvös University Lendület Hot Universe Research Group Budapest Hungary

    MTA‐Eötvös University Lendület Hot Universe Research Group Budapest Hungary

  4. Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research Utrecht The Netherlands

  5. RIKEN

    Affiliation as printed

    RIKEN High Energy Astrophysics Laboratory Saitama Japan

  6. Leiden University · Leiden Observatory · Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden Observatory Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research Utrecht The Netherlands

  7. University of Strathclyde

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Physics University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK

  8. Leiden University · Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe · Leiden Observatory · Space Research Organisation Netherlands · The University of Tokyo

    Affiliation as printed

    Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI) University of Tokyo Kashiwa Japan

    Leiden Observatory Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research Utrecht The Netherlands

  9. Leiden University · Leiden Observatory · Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden Observatory Leiden University Leiden The Netherlands

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research Utrecht The Netherlands

Cited by 16 stored of 16

16 results

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 61