October 01, 2008 article Open access What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine DOI: 10.1258/jrsm.2008.080062 Full text (OA) OpenAlex Authors 0 Author list not loaded yet. Cited by 3 stored of 225 Search Sort Most cited Newest Oldest Patent citations Title Any typearticle review book-chapter conference-paper preprint dissertation book dataset other Any fieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences Arts and Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology Business, Management and Accounting Chemical Engineering Chemistry Computer Science Decision Sciences Dentistry Earth and Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics and Finance Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology and Microbiology Materials Science Mathematics Medicine Neuroscience Nursing Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Physics and Astronomy Psychology Social Sciences Veterinary Open access Fostering trustworthy information: countering disinformation when there are no bare facts 2025 Royal Society Open Science article Social Sciences Misinformation and Its Impacts Open access 1 citations Recommendations for accelerating open preprint peer review to improve the culture of science 2024 PLoS Biology article Decision Sciences Academic Publishing and Open Access Open access 37 citations No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic 2020 Research Evaluation article Decision Sciences Academic Publishing and Open Access Open access 87 citations 3 results References 0