A

Process-level uncertainties challenge system-level direct air capture assessments

Research Square

Abstract

Abstract System-level assessments of direct air capture (DAC) commonly rely on individual process models, overlooking the influence of model choice on system-level conclusions. Here, we quantify this impact by integrating weather-dependent performance data from seven solid-sorbent DAC models into an otherwise consistent energy system framework. DAC representation is the largest source of variation in levelized CO2 capture cost, accounting for 43% of the observed variation across the climate-renewable archetypes considered compared with 16% for climate and 6% for renewable-resource configuration. Model-dependent cost differences exceed 1000 € tCO2-1 at individual locations. Different model representations can also reverse siting preferences, substantially alter cost-optimal system design, and determine whether future CO2 capture-cost targets are achieved. Our results further demonstrate how individual process-level assumptions can propagate through the assessment, resulting in a major source of system-level uncertainty. The harmonized DAC performance data developed here enable systematic comparison of alternative DAC representation in future system assessments.

Authors 20

  1. Henrik Wenzel corresponding

    Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH

  2. University of Calgary

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Calgary

  3. Eindhoven University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology

  4. Paul Scherrer Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Paul Scherrer Institute

  5. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Technical Thermodynamics, RWTH Aachen University

  6. ETH Zurich · Institute of Energy and Process Engineering

    Affiliation as printed

    Energy and Process Systems Engineering, Institute of Energy and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich

  7. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH

  8. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH

  9. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Jülich

  10. Imperial College London

    Affiliation as printed

    Imperial College London

  11. University of Calgary

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Calgary

  12. ETH Zurich

    Affiliation as printed

    ETH Zurich

  13. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH

  14. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Institute of Climate and Energy Systems

  15. Saudi Aramco (Saudi Arabia) · Saudi Aramco (United States)

    Affiliation as printed

    Life Cycle Assessment Group, Technology Strategy & Planning Department, Saudi Aramco

  16. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH

  17. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University

  18. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute of Technical Thermodynamics, RWTH Aachen University

  19. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH

  20. Forschungszentrum Jülich

    Affiliation as printed

    Forschungszentrum Jülich

Cited by 0 stored of 0

References 0