A

Complementary chemical probes and substrates reveal split subsite specificity in a fungal GH12 glucanase

ChemRxiv

Abstract

Xyloglucans are structurally heterogeneous polysaccharides in which xylosylation patterns vary along the β-(1,4)-glucan backbone. Because endo-glycanases engage substrates across both sides of the scissile bond, we hypothesised that GH12 substrate selectivity may vary across the catalytic cleft. We combined activity-based profiling of basidiomycete secretomes with defined fluorogenic substrates, oligosaccharide product mapping and structural analyses. TlGH12A, a previously characterised endo-β-glucanase, reacted with a xyloglucan-configured cyclophellitol probe despite showing no detectable activity on polymeric xyloglucan. Complementary analyses revealed that substrate recognition differs across its catalytic cleft. TlGH12A hydrolysed XXXG-4MU approximately 60-fold more efficiently than GGGG-4MU, demonstrating a strong negative-subsite preference for xylosylated glucan. Crystal structures showed xylosylated glucan occupying subsites −4 to −1, whereas unbranched glucan occupied the positive subsites. Comparison with ligand-bound GH12 xyloglucanases identified steric constraints that may restrict positive-subsite accommodation of Xyl substituents. Sequence-network, phylogenetic and structural-modelling analyses suggest that this architecture recurs among Basidiomycota GH12 endoglucanases. Complementary probes, hydrolysable substrates and structural analyses resolved the basis of this previously unrecognised distribution of specificity in TlGH12A. These findings reveal how substrate recognition can vary across a GH12 catalytic cleft, with implications for understanding fungal plant cell wall deconstruction and for identifying and engineering glucan-active enzymes with distinct substrate specificities.

Authors 10

  1. University of York

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Chemistry

    University of York

  2. University of York

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Chemistry

    University of York

  3. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Bio-organic Synthesis, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 CC

  4. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Bio-organic Synthesis, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 CC

  5. University of York

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Chemistry

    University of York

  6. University of York

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Chemistry

    University of York

  7. Aix-Marseille Université · Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques

    Affiliation as printed

    Aix-Marseille Université, BBF, Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques

    INRAE

  8. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Toulouse · Centre de Recherches sur les Macromolécules Végétales · Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · Université de Toulouse

    Affiliation as printed

    CERMAV

    TBI

    Université de Toulouse, CNRS, INRAE, INSA

  9. Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Bio-organic Synthesis, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, Leiden, Netherlands, 2333 CC

  10. University of York

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Chemistry

    University of York

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 0