A

Potential and pitfalls of personal reference intervals in general practice: A focus group and case vignette study among Dutch general practitioners

European Journal of General Practice, vol. 32, pp. 2729220

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Personalised medicine is increasingly used in clinical practice and tailors care to individual characteristics. A new application in laboratory diagnostics is personalised reference intervals (PeRIs). Unlike population-based reference intervals (PoRIs), PeRIs use previous results of the patient, providing ranges tailored to an individual's own baseline. This may improve interpretation of laboratory results and possibly patient care. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore perspectives of general practitioners (GPs) on PeRIs, and maps the identified benefits, disadvantages, risks and prerequisites before implementation of PeRIs. METHODS: = 98) were used to explore the opinion, interpretation and application of PeRIs among Dutch GPs. RESULTS: Focus groups and the survey identified benefits, including easier interpretation, efficiency and more meaningful follow-up and referrals, as well as risks such as alert fatigue, overreliance, and underdiagnosis. The survey showed that PeRIs may alter GP behaviour. When a haemoglobin result was presented with versus without a PeRI comment, a significant portion of GPs adjusted their clinical strategy in these fictional cases. Participants emphasised that PeRIs should support, not replace clinical judgement. CONCLUSION: Our study reveals arguments both supporting and opposing PeRIs. Importantly, GPs perceived added value for diagnostic decision-making. We advise accompanying implementation of PeRI with education on responsibilities and underlying algorithms. In this way, PeRIs can contribute to behavioural change that may lead to better and more meaningful, personalised care.

Authors 6

  1. Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · Unilabs (Switzerland)

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical Chemistry, Unilabs/Atalmedial Medical Diagnostic Centers

    Laboratorium voor Klinische Chemie, Hematologie en Immunologie Alkmaar, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep

  2. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center

    LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center

  3. University of Amsterdam · Amsterdam University Medical Centers · Amsterdam Public Health · Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism

    Affiliation as printed

    Amsterdam Public Health & Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism

    Laboratory Specialized Diagnostics & Research, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam

  4. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center

    LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center

  5. Unilabs (Switzerland)

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical Chemistry, Unilabs/Atalmedial Medical Diagnostic Centers

  6. Unilabs (Switzerland)

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Clinical Chemistry, Unilabs/Atalmedial Medical Diagnostic Centers

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 30