From interdependent movements to shared action: Connecting publishing and assessment reforms
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Abstract
Research assessment and scholarly publishing play interconnected roles in shaping research culture, incentives, and norms that ultimately determine what knowledge is produced, communicated, trusted, and rewarded. These two interdependent components of the research system are undergoing change, fueled by initiatives that share core principles, goals, and challenges, but act largely in parallel. Coordinated action in assessment and publishing reform holds the opportunity for more effective, fairer, and more durable change. The problems in research assessment and scholarly publishing are well documented, from overreliance on journal prestige and the dominance of selective bibliographic databases to the underrecognition of peer review and the limited visibility of research outputs beyond journal articles. Various reform initiatives have emerged to deal with these problems, both in the research assessment domain and in the scholarly publishing domain. However, these problems cannot be effectively addressed by a reform in either of these domains alone. Reform needs to be coordinated across domains. Fragmented reform efforts may not only duplicate work, but may also send inconsistent signals to researchers and institutions, which may undermine the adoption of more responsible practices. Stronger coordination creates tangible benefits across the research system. For reform initiatives, it increases collective reach, legitimacy, and influence while reducing duplication of effort and strengthening shared messages. For research performing and funding organizations, and policymakers, it provides a more coherent foundation for policy development and implementation, enabling organizations to draw on shared experience while adapting approaches to their own missions and contexts. For researchers, coordination helps ensure that emerging practices in scholarly publishing are recognized and rewarded consistently, reducing uncertainty and creating more pathways for diverse contributions to be valued. In this paper, we give an overview of how we are considering these issues and propose ways forward for coordinating the reform movements in research assessment and scholarly publishing. Importantly, this coordination is not intended to replace existing initiatives or create new layers of governance. Rather, it is a light-touch and inclusive effort to coordinate agendas, amplify existing work, and promote shared learning.
Authors 24
-
Ludo Waltman Aachen
Affiliation as printed
Leiden University
-
Affiliation as printed
DORA
-
Affiliation as printed
ASAPbio
-
Affiliation as printed
International Science Council
-
Faculty of 1000 (United States)
Affiliation as printed
F1000
-
Affiliation as printed
DORA
-
International Science Council · University of Edinburgh
Affiliation as printed
International Science Council
University of Edinburgh
-
André Brasil Aachen
Leiden University · Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Affiliation as printed
Leiden University
Research on Research Institute (RoRI)
Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
-
National Research Foundation · National Research Foundation
Affiliation as printed
National Research Foundation
-
Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment
Affiliation as printed
CoARA
Research Evaluation Global Alliance
-
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Affiliation as printed
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
-
Affiliation as printed
Cambridge University Press
-
Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition
Affiliation as printed
Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition
-
Affiliation as printed
Public Library of Science
-
DST Centre for Policy Research
Affiliation as printed
DST Centre for Policy Research
-
National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Affiliation as printed
Maynooth University
-
Affiliation as printed
African Journals Online
-
Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
Affiliation as printed
Consejo Latinoamericano de Ciencias Sociales
FOLEC
-
Federation of Finnish Learned Societies · Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment
Affiliation as printed
Federation of Finnish Learned Societies
CoARA
Helsinki Initiative
-
Affiliation as printed
eLife Sciences Publications
-
Affiliation as printed
Make Data Count
-
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Affiliation as printed
NASEM Roundtable
-
Affiliation as printed
Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
-
Marie Curie Alumni Association
Affiliation as printed
Marie Curie Alumni Association
Cited by 0 stored of 0
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).