Augmented assessment: shifting purposes, evolving methods, and the future of national research assessment systems
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Abstract
National research assessment systems stand at a crossroads. As countries worldwide redesign evaluation approaches - exploring AI-assisted methods, open data sources, and real-time dashboards - they face a fundamental question: can these innovations deliver on promises of reducing administrative burden and enhancing strategic intelligence while upholding responsible assessment principles? This session convenes leading researchers and reform advocates to examine what national assessment systems of the future may look like. Speakers grounded in different national systems and policy contexts will compare concrete reform experiences across national contexts, explore tensions between innovation and responsibility, efficiency and legitimacy, and accountability and learning. With research integrity challenges mounting in an era of AI-generated content and multiple countries reforming large-scale national exercises simultaneously, this session provides both a rare window for collective learning and a timely forum for raising difficult questions about the long-term performance and viability of national assessment systems.
Authors 6
-
Affiliation as printed
CWTS, Leiden University, Netherlands | Research on Research Institute, Leiden University, China
-
Affiliation as printed
Wuhan University, Wuhan University, China
-
Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education
Affiliation as printed
NIFU, NIFU, Norway
-
Affiliation as printed
Culture Base, Culture Base, United Kingdom
-
Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques
Affiliation as printed
OECD, OECD, France
-
Affiliation as printed
RoRI, University College London, United Kingdom
Cited by 0 stored of 0
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).