A

Microscopic Damage Evolution and Failure Mechanisms of Rocks with Different Mineral Compositions Under Thermal-Mechanical Loading

Rock Mechanics Bulletin, pp. 100372

Abstract

This study investigated the evolution of mineral contacts and cracks in granite and sandstone subjected to high-temperature damage. To represent the heterogeneous strength distribution and random failure of rock micro-elements, a PFC damage contact model was developed by introducing a two-parameter Weibull strength distribution into particle contacts. A temperature-dependent damage coefficient was further incorporated into the failure criterion to describe the stress–strain response under coupled thermo-mechanical loading. The numerical results agree well with the experimental mechanical parameters, with errors in elastic modulus and peak strength below 5%. The proposed model effectively captures the elastic stage, peak response, post-peak softening behaviour, and damage evolution of the rocks, while the simulated failure modes are consistent with the observed damage characteristics. Statistical analysis of microcrack evolution and effective mineral contacts further explains the macroscopic failure mechanisms of feldspar-dominated granite and quartz-dominated sandstone. The results indicate that, under high temperatures up to 600 °C for sandstone and 400 °C for granite, sandstone cracks are mainly induced by thermal expansion, whereas granite cracks are related to reduced crystal spacing during cooling. Without lateral constraint, sandstone experiences relatively limited thermal damage, while granite develops more cracks due to thermal stress. Confining pressure improves sandstone strength but has limited influence on granite because inter-mineral microcracks are largely irreversible. At room temperature, mineral grain failure mainly occurs horizontally, whereas high temperature causes sandstone failure to shift obliquely. Granite develops multidirectional cracks due to local stress concentration.

Authors 7

  1. University of Shanghai for Science and Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Civil Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Rd, Shanghai 200093, China

  2. University of Shanghai for Science and Technology · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Civil Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Rd, Shanghai 200093, China

    Department of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstr. 4-20 Haus A, D-52064 Aachen, Germany

  3. University of Shanghai for Science and Technology · Technische Universität Berlin

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Civil Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 516 Jungong Rd, Shanghai 200093, China

    Department of Engineering Geology, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Technical University of Berlin, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 1, 10587 Berlin, Germany

  4. University of Cambridge · Northeastern University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, CB3 0FA, United Kingdom

    School of Resources and Civil Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110819, China

  5. Soochow University

    Affiliation as printed

    School of Rail Transportation, Soochow University, Suzhou 215131, China

  6. Technische Universität Berlin

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Engineering Geology, Institute of Applied Geosciences, Technical University of Berlin, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 1, 10587 Berlin, Germany

  7. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, RWTH Aachen University, Lochnerstr. 4-20 Haus A, D-52064 Aachen, Germany

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 44