Multi-Stakeholder Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II: Beyond Single Decision Maker Optimization
Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (GECCO Companion), pp. 313–316
Abstract
Evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) is widely used to solve problems with competing objectives, yet most existing approaches assume a single decision maker and offer limited support for the diverse and often incomplete preferences found in multi-stakeholder settings. We introduce MS-NSGA-II, an extension of NSGA-II that incorporates heterogeneous stakeholder aspirations without requiring negotiation or repeated interaction. Stakeholders specify only the objectives and aspiration levels relevant to them, and a normalized dissatisfaction measure guides selection while preserving the underlying multi-objective formulation and maintaining diversity in the objective space. Experiments on benchmark problems with up to ten objectives and a real-world area design case study show that MS-NSGA-II significantly reduces stakeholder dissatisfaction and uncovers Pareto-superior regions, particularly in higher-dimensional settings.
Authors 5
-
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · University of Amsterdam
Affiliation as printed
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, The Hague, Netherlands
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
-
Affiliation as printed
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
-
Michel Mandjes Aachen
Leiden University · University of Amsterdam
Affiliation as printed
Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
-
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
Affiliation as printed
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, The Hague, Netherlands
-
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research · Delft University of Technology
Affiliation as printed
Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, The Hague, Netherlands
Cited by 0 stored of 0
No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).
References 18
18 results