A

Decoder Comparability Across Quantum Software Stacks: Repeated-Round Surface and Digitized-GKP Syndrome Replay

arXiv (Cornell University)

Abstract

We present a contract-preserving, family-aware comparison of decoder behavior across four syndrome-generation stacks (PennyLane, Qiskit, Cirq, and a LiDMaS+ reference) under a fixed replay interface. Request streams from repeated-round surface-code and digitized-GKP circuits are replayed through BP, MWPM, and UF with matched controls. The unified matrix spans 24 cells and achieves line-level integrity: $24\,000$ request lines, $24\,000$ response lines, response ratio $=1.0$ in every cell, zero parse failures, and zero decoder-name mismatches. Fifteen warning-no-syndrome events occur only in GKP-Cirq rows. Within-family ordering is stable in both families ($\mathrm{BP}<\mathrm{MWPM}<\mathrm{UF}$); source-averaged flip counts are 2.435, 4.768, and 5.870 for surface and 1.595, 2.908, and 3.681 for GKP. Relative to MWPM, BP reduces mean intervention volume by $48.9\%$ in surface and $45.1\%$ in GKP. Source-vs-reference effects are family dependent, with larger coherent shifts in GKP. Source-bootstrap ranks remain unchanged, and hidden-truth sidecars add an outer-code logical-parity error-rate check in which UF has the largest source-mean rate in both families. The comparison is stack-aware, contract-verified, and avoids raw cross-family threshold-equivalence claims.

Authors 5

  1. Volkswagen Group (Germany) · RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Physics , RWTH Aachen , Germany

    Volkswagen AG , Berliner Ring 2 , Wolfsburg 38440 , Germany

  2. Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Physics , Federal University of Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora , 36036-900 , Brazil

  3. Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Computational and Applied Mechanics , Federal University of Juiz de Fora , Juiz de Fora , 36036-900 , Brazil

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 0