A

PROTOCOL: Interventions Targeting Misinformation, Disinformation and Malinformation for Reducing and Countering Violent Extremism: A Systematic Review

Campbell Systematic Reviews, vol. 22, pp. 18911803261459099

Abstract

The dissemination of false or inaccurate information, and its subsequent effect on behaviour, is not a new phenomenon. However, in recent years, alongside the emergence of multiple methods of information transmission, the speed, scale and volume of mis-, dis-, and malinformation (MDM) has reached a new threshold, contributing to societal polarisation and mistrust towards authorities. It has been postulated that the phenomenon may also play a role in the psychosocial process of radicalisation . By re-framing grievances or events and creating shared identities or networks amongst ‘believers’, exposure to MDM may interact with other audience vulnerabilities to facilitate radicalisation towards violent extremist narratives and networks. This systematic review will examine interventions designed to counter or reduce the effects of exposure to false information and their impact on violent extremism. The review will synthesise evidence across diverse methodologies and settings, identify gaps in the literature, and highlight best practices for reducing or countering the effects of false narratives and their subsequent influence on violent extremist behaviour and attitudes. The findings will inform policymakers, educators, and practitioners about actionable measures to combat the harmful consequences of false information in the context of violent extremism.

Authors 6

  1. C Pinto de Carvalho corresponding

    Universidade do Porto · Dublin City University · Universidade Nova de Lisboa

    Affiliation as printed

    Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland

    NOVA University of Lisbon

    University of Porto

  2. Universidade do Porto · Institute of Public Health, University of Porto

    Affiliation as printed

    Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto

    University of Porto

  3. Universidade do Porto

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Porto

  4. Universidade do Porto · Institute of Public Health, University of Porto

    Affiliation as printed

    Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto

  5. Sarah Carthy Aachen

    Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden University

  6. Universidade do Porto

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Porto

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 116