A

Severity over source: Understanding transgressors' motive attributions of punishment

British Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 65, pp. e70118

Abstract

Punishment conveys social information to transgressors, who attribute motives to punishers. Drawing on the motive-attribution framework, we examined whether transgressors' attributions to competitive (i.e. harming transgressors), individualistic (i.e. managing one's own interests) and prosocial (i.e. healing relationships) motives differ depending on whether punishment is administered by victims (second-party punishment) or uninvolved observers (third-party punishment), and how these attributions relate to downstream affective, relational and behavioural outcomes. In an incentivized Stealing Game, participants could steal valuable points and were punished either by the victim or an observer. Subsequently, transgressors reported their motive attributions, affect and willingness to reconcile and completed a measure of prosocial behaviour towards an unrelated other. Contrary to predictions, motive attributions did not systematically differ between second- and third-party punishment, except that third-party punishment was more strongly attributed to reputational concerns (i.e. a subdimension of individualistic motive attribution). Punishment severity emerged as an important predictor, with harsher sanctions linked to stronger competitive and individualistic attributions. Competitive motive attribution, in turn, was associated with higher negative affect and lower positive affect, willingness to reconcile and prosocial behaviour. Overall, transgressors' responses to punishment were less clearly shaped by who punished and more closely linked to punishment severity and motive attribution.

Authors 3

  1. Mathias Twardawski corresponding

    Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Psychology Ludwig‐Maximilians‐Universität München Munich Germany

  2. Leiden University · Max Planck Institute for Behavioral Economics

    Affiliation as printed

    Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods Bonn Germany

    Social, Economic and Organisational Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology Leiden University Leiden Netherlands

  3. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · Freie Universität Berlin

    Affiliation as printed

    Einstein Research Unit ‘Coping with Affective Polarization’ Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 0