A

Artificial Intelligence for Biomedical Diagnostics: Diagnostic Accuracy and Reliability of Multimodal Large Language Models in Electrocardiogram Interpretation

Life, vol. 16, pp. 681

Abstract

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a central tool in cardiovascular diagnostics, yet interpretation requires expertise and remains subject to variability. Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown emerging capabilities in medical image analysis, but their performance in ECG interpretation remains insufficiently characterized. This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and inter-run reliability of five MLLMs across ECG interpretation tasks. Thirteen standard 12-lead ECGs were presented to five models (ChatGPT-5.3, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Opus 4.6, Grok 4.1, and ERNIE 5.0) across five independent runs per case, yielding 2275 task-level assessments. Six categorical interpretation tasks (rhythm, electrical axis, PR/P-wave morphology, QRS duration, ST/T-wave morphology, and QTc interval) were compared with expert-consensus ground truth, while heart rate estimation was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE). Overall categorical accuracy ranged from 52.3% to 64.9%. QRS duration classification achieved the highest accuracy (66.2-90.8%), whereas ST/T-wave assessment showed the lowest performance (20.0-41.5%). Heart rate MAE ranged from 14.8 to 46.7 bpm. A dissociation between diagnostic accuracy and inter-run reliability was observed across models. These findings indicate that current MLLMs do not achieve clinically reliable ECG interpretation performance and highlight the importance of assessing diagnostic accuracy and inter-run reliability when evaluating artificial intelligence systems in biomedical diagnostics.

Authors 5

  1. Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Health Management, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Lange Gasse 20, 90403 Nuremberg, Germany

    Practices for Nuclear Medicine, Rubensstraße 125, 12157 Berlin, Germany

  2. Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany

  3. RWTH Aachen University · Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Havelhöhe, Kladower Damm 221, 14089 Berlin, Germany

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, RWTH Aachen University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany

  4. University of Zurich · Witten/Herdecke University · University Hospital Zurich

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany

    Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland

  5. Ibrahim Güler corresponding

    Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Health Management, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Lange Gasse 20, 90403 Nuremberg, Germany

    Department of Plastic, Aesthetic and Hand Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 30