A

Comment on egusphere-2026-313

Abstract

Abstract. Robust estimates of methane emissions are critical for understanding their impacts on atmospheric warming and air quality, and for assessing methane mitigation strategies. Gridded inventories, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory (EPA GHGI), the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR 2024), and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Fossil Fuel Oil and Gas inventory (NOAA FOG), are constructed to evaluate large-scale emission patterns and support identifying emission mitigation priorities and prioritizing future measurements. However, substantial differences across inventories complicate such assessments. We benchmark EPA GHGI, EDGAR 2024, and NOAA FOG against flux estimates from an atmospheric inversion of Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT) data from 2012 to 2020 over the Contiguous United States (CONUS). A key technical challenge is the heterogeneous sensitivity of satellite-derived fluxes, which depends on measurement uncertainty, coverage, and inversion model configuration. We account for this heterogeneity by applying an inversion operator to each inventory prior to comparison with the GOSAT-based estimates. The GOSAT estimates are most sensitive to oil&gas and livestock emissions; oil and gas emissions are consistent with NOAA FOG (14.1 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹ in 2015), but exceed EPA GHGI and EDGAR, particularly across Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana. GOSAT-based livestock emissions exceed EPA GHGI and EDGAR by 1–2 Tg CH4 yr⁻¹, with the largest differences in the Midwest and California. Despite these discrepancies, both activity and satellite based estimates show no observable trends from 2012 to 2020 in fossil and livestock emissions.

Authors 14

  1. John R. Worden corresponding

    California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory · University of California, Los Angeles

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States

    Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States

  2. Sudhanshu Pandey corresponding

    California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States

  3. California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States

  4. California Institute of Technology · Jet Propulsion Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States

  5. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences · University of Colorado Boulder · NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States

    NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States

  6. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences · University of Colorado Boulder · NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, United States

    NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, United States

  7. Space Research Organisation Netherlands

    Affiliation as printed

    SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Leiden, The Netherlands

  8. Rocky Mountain Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Rocky Mountain Institute, Boulder, Colorado, United States

  9. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

  10. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

  11. Harvard University · Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

    Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

  12. Harvard University

    Affiliation as printed

    Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States

  13. Rocky Mountain Institute

    Affiliation as printed

    Rocky Mountain Institute, Boulder, Colorado, United States

  14. North Carolina State University

    Affiliation as printed

    North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 0