A

DEEP‐DISORDER: Motion Correction in 3D MRI via Segment Reconstruction and Registration

NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 39, pp. e70286

Abstract

ABSTRACT 3D MR image acquisition is inherently time intensive, rendering it susceptible to patient motion during scanning. This may introduce significant blurring and artifacts, potentially necessitating reacquisition. We propose a modular framework to retrospectively correct for intrascan motion in 3D brain MRI, without active motion tracking. Serving as the backbone of our approach is an existing distributed and incoherent sampling scheme (DISORDER), combined with a fast network trained for highly undersampled reconstruction. This enables approximate reconstructions of anatomy after every few seconds, using only a tiny fraction of k‐space data (< 2%). While these reconstructions are only approximate, we postulate they are sufficient to estimate motion patterns at said temporal resolution. Groupwise registration, notable for its elimination of registration bias, is utilized for estimating rigid motion parameters, which are leveraged to reconstruct the measured data with reduced motion artifacts. The approach was evaluated on 94 retrospectively and 3 prospectively motion‐corrupted in vivo 3D T1‐weighted brain MRI acquisitions. The estimated motion parameters matched the known retrospective motion with 0.06 mm and 0.13° accuracy, resulting in an improvement in reconstruction quality from to SSIM for the retrospective scans. The prospective scans improved from to SSIM after correction in the case of gradual motion and from to SSIM for extreme motion. In conclusion, the proposed approach, that is free of external tracking devices or navigators, successfully estimated and corrected 3D motion between small subportions of a scan. This resulted in vastly improved image quality, making volumetric MRI substantially more tolerant to motion.

Authors 8

  1. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands

  2. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands

  3. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands

  4. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands

  5. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands

  6. Eindhoven University of Technology

    Affiliation as printed

    Cardiologs Paris France

    Department of Mathematics and Computer Science Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven the Netherlands

  7. Philips (Germany)

    Affiliation as printed

    Philips Innovative Technologies Hamburg Germany

  8. Leiden University Medical Center

    Affiliation as printed

    Department of Radiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 30