A

Comparative auxiliary spreadsheet for Southern Bantu languages (Version associated with Linguistic Typology article)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Abstract

This spreadsheet contains information extracted from descriptive grammars, theoretically oriented articles, doctoral and MA theses, dictionaries, and, in a few cases, research fieldnotes. This is the version associated with the following forthcoming article: Crane, Thera Marie, Hannah Gibson and Kristina Riedel. Forthcoming (2026). Auxiliary verb constructions in Southern Bantu. Linguistic Typology. New columns in this version: Count for stats This column codes (imperfectly, but using our best effort!) for whether this lexeme conforms to our definition of auxiliaries: AUXILIARY CONSTRUCTIONS are verbal complexes consisting of at least one functional (auxiliary) verb and one lexical verb that share a logical subject and form a single predicate, with the auxiliary verbs(s) modifying the lexical verb. AUXILIARY VERBS are the functional element(s) in auxiliary constructions and can only be used with their auxiliary functions when followed by a lexical verb complement. (Crane et al. forthc.) - see that paper for more details Codes: YES (is auxiliary according to our definition; this is what we counted when generating documented auxiliary counts)LEX (is a fully lexical verb according to our definition)NO (see rationale for notes)NO-REL / NO-2MEAN (do not count as a separate auxiliary, because it represents the same form with two or more functions, possibly RELated; do count for the very rough statistics on functions, which are given as rough proportions in the paper) Rationale Explanations of choices and cases of uncertainty (for some forms, we were not able to get sufficient data to be completely certain of our decisions) Original descriptive information: We include almost everything described as an auxiliary or “deficient verb” in the literature, excluding only a few items that seemed to us to be straightforwardly lexical and those that seemed to serve functions other than auxiliaries (e.g. conjunctions or complementizers, although we included some of these that may also have auxiliary function). We have therefore likely erred on the side of inclusion rather than exclusion. The spreadsheet is meant as a research tool rather than an analysis in itself. While we have tried to be careful and relatively consistent, there will inevitably be some inconsistencies in our notation and possibly misinterpretations of the source material, especially given that some auxiliary functions may not be straightforwardly translatable into English. It should also be seen as a living document, which we hope to update as more information becomes available, and which we hope others will use as an aid and inspiration to more in-depth research. UPDATES: v1.1 (cleaner version with some additions and corrections) v2.0: Changes – Core aux meaning (revised) column added (old Core aux meaning column hidden in uploaded version), with an attempt to consolidate meanings, increase consistency, and match more entries for cross-linguistic comparison; some missing references added; some errors corrected; some new data on Setswana. v2.1: Changes – Cleaned up and corrected some of the data; added some Xitsonga "prefixes" to the main sheet on the grounds that they are reported also to work as auxiliaries. A note on orthography: we have generally (barring typos or inadvertent omissions of diacritic markings) followed the orthographic conventions of the source material, which itself uses a range of orthographic practices, many of which are not transparent to those unfamiliar with the languages in question. Southern Bantu languages typically have extensive consonant inventories, including several series of click consonants in Nguni languages and Sesotho (Southern Sotho).Click consonants are generally represented in the orthographies as c (dental click /ǀ/), q (alveolar click /ǃ/), and x (lateral click /ǁ/), with surrounding consonants indicating features such as voice, nasalisation, and aspiration. Other typical consonants of Southern Bantu languages include lateral fricatives, written as hl (voiceless) and dl (voiced), as well as lateral affricates, written as tl (voiceless) and tlh (aspirated). In addition, vowel systems are frequently reduced in the orthographies: for example, in Sesotho, nine phonemic vowels are represented with five graphemes (some sources represent more using diacritics). For explanations of the orthographies used, we refer readers to the original sources referenced; descriptions of modern orthographic conventions can usually be found on the languages’ respective Wikipedia pages. Description of sheets · Aux hosts the main database of auxiliary forms. Some forms are listed twice if the literature describes them as having two or more functions that we judged as distinctive. · Prefix from aux includes forms that synchronically appear as prefixes, but are analysed in the literature as auxiliaries and/or are clearly grammaticalized as auxiliaries. Some of these may also appear as non-affixed auxiliaries, but it is our understanding that they are synchronically primarily or exclusively affixes. · Sources and notes lists the sources consulted and their short references in the spreadsheet · Language details gives typological information on the languages and varieties included. See Gunnink et al. 2022 for discussion of historical relationships between these languages/varieties. Description of columns in Aux and Prefix from aux sheets, with discussion · Cluster allows for sorting by language cluster · Guthrie code specifies the language/variety involved · Language lists the language/variety. In most cases, the languages are listed using their endonyms (see language details for more information), but the languages called Ndebele are listed as S(outhern) Ndebele, N(orthern) Ndebele, and Ndebele (Zimbabwe) for clarity. · Auxiliary lists the auxiliaries as given in the reference works. · Source meaning lists the meanings of the auxiliaries’ lexical sources, as given in the reference works or a bilingual dictionary. Occasionally, these are shortened or paraphrased. · Core source meaning attempts to synthesize and harmonize the source meanings for comparability (e.g. source > function) and easier sorting. They are a simplification of the meanings listed in the source meaning column and involve some interpretation on our part, and may therefore introduce misleading analyses in some cases, although we have tried to be careful. There may also be some remaining inconsistencies. · Meaning / Function of auxiliary notes the auxiliary functions as described in the relevant reference sources, sometimes slightly abbreviated, with differing descriptions noted along with the name or intials of the corresponding authors. · Core aux meaning (revised) attempts to synthesize and harmonize the auxilary function for comparability (e.g. function > source) and easier sorting. They are a simplification of the meanings listed in the meaning /function of auxiliary column and involve some interpretation on our part, and may therefore introduce misleading analyses in some cases, although we have tried to be careful. There may also be some remaining inconsistencies. · Category (general) is our preliminary assessment of whether the auxiliary primarily expresses time, aspect, polarity, mood, or other meaning (e.g. adverbial, evaluative, etc.), or a combination thereof. It is meant for rough statistical purposes and may not be fully consistent, especially as an auxiliary's function(s) can span several categories. · Category (specific) is our more specific assessment as to the category of the auxiliary’s function. We have tried to be consistent, but some inconsistencies may remain, and because of the uncertainties involved, we do not consider this a definitive analysis, but rather an aid in forming rough generalizations. · Followed by… columns have a Y if the auxiliary is described as being followed by that kind of verb form in the literature (in a few cases, we have inferred this information from examples) and is meant for rough statistical and comparative purposes. We have called “situative” (SIT) forms often described as “participial” and combined “consecutive” (or “narrative”) and “subjunctive” forms into one column, as the same auxilairy often takes both forms, depending on its temporal interpretation. See Crane et al. (submitted) for further discussion. The final “followed by” column contains information about the lexical verb’s form as given by the authors of the relevant descriptions. · Other notes is our notes (including notes from the reference works) and questions; this column is informal and sometimes notes points of unclarity. · Reference lists the source of the auxiliary information. Lexical source information is not always listed here, but references for lexical sources are listed in the general reference list. · Reconstruction gives information regarding proposed proto-Bantu reconstructions of the auxiliary sources, based mostly on Bastin et al. (2002) [BLR]. BLR entries include their index number for referential purposes; others are cited according to their source · Reconstruction notes contains occasional notes on these reconstructions. · Appears more than once (possibly with different meanings depending on following form) is a statistical aid to avoid double counting of auxilairies that may have two distinct functions. A "Y" in this column indicates that the auxiliary form appears twice (possibly with different tense/aspect marking, although this decision, too was subjective) and is reported to have seemingly divergent functions. Whether something is listed in one or two rows (i.e. whether the meanings are considered distinct) is a subjective matter, and risks inconsistency, so the "Y" helps mitigate this issue. References Bastin, Yvonne, André Coupez, Evariste Mumba & Thilo C. Schadeberg (eds.). 2

Authors 3

  1. University of Helsinki · University of Pretoria

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Pretoria

    University of Helsinki

  2. Hilde Gunnink Aachen

    Leiden University · Ghent University

    Affiliation as printed

    Ghent University

    Leiden University

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 0