A

Self-consistent secondary cosmic microwave background anisotropies and extragalactic foregrounds in the flamingo simulations

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 548

Abstract

ABSTRACT Secondary anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) contain information that can be used to test both cosmological models and models of galaxy formation. Starting from light-cone-based healpix maps and catalogues, we present a new set of mock CMB maps constructed in a self-consistent manner from the flamingo suite of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations, including CMB lensing, thermal and kinetic Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effects, cosmic infrared background, radio point source and anisotropic screening maps. We show that these simulations reproduce a wide range of observational constraints. We also compare our simulations with previous predictions based on dark matter-only simulations which generally model the secondary anisotropies independently from one another, concluding that our hydrodynamical simulation mocks perform at least as well as previous mocks in matching the observations whilst retaining self-consistency in the predictions of the different components. Using the model variations in flamingo, we further explore how the signals depend on cosmology and feedback modelling, and we predict cross-correlations between some of the signals that differ significantly from those in previous mocks. The mock CMB maps should provide a valuable resource for exploring correlations between different secondary anisotropies and other large-scale structure tracers, and can be applied to forecasts for upcoming surveys.

Authors 8

  1. Tianyi Yang corresponding

    Liverpool John Moores University

    Affiliation as printed

    Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University , Liverpool L3 5RF ,

  2. Ian G. McCarthy corresponding

    Liverpool John Moores University

    Affiliation as printed

    Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University , Liverpool L3 5RF ,

  3. University of Cambridge

    Affiliation as printed

    Cavendish Astrophysics, University of Cambridge , Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA ,

    Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge, University of Cambridge , Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA ,

  4. University of Manchester

    Affiliation as printed

    Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Alan Turing Building, University of Manchester , Manchester M13 9PL ,

  5. University of Cambridge

    Affiliation as printed

    DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge , Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 OWA ,

    Kavli Institute for Cosmology Cambridge, University of Cambridge , Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA ,

  6. Durham University

    Affiliation as printed

    Durham University Institute for Computational Cosmology, Department of Physics, , South Road, Durham DH1 3LE ,

  7. Leiden University · Leiden Observatory

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden Observatory, Leiden University , PO Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden ,

    Lorentz Institute for Theoretical Physics, Leiden University , PO box 9506, NL-2300 RA Leiden ,

  8. Leiden University · Leiden Observatory

    Affiliation as printed

    Leiden Observatory, Leiden University , PO Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden ,

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 0