A

Agents of discovery

SciPost Physics, vol. 20

Abstract

The substantial data volumes encountered in modern particle physics and other domains of fundamental physics research allow (and require) the use of increasingly complex data analysis tools and workflows. While the use of machine learning (ML) tools for data analysis has recently proliferated, these tools are typically special-purpose algorithms that rely, for example, on encoded physics knowledge to reach optimal performance. In this work, we investigate a new and orthogonal direction: Using recent progress in large language models (LLMs) to create a team of agents — instances of LLMs with specific subtasks — that jointly solve data analysis-based research problems in a way similar to how a human researcher might: by creating code to operate standard tools and libraries (including ML systems) and by building on results of previous iterations. If successful, such agent-based systems could be deployed to automate routine analysis components to counteract the increasing complexity of modern tool chains. To investigate the capabilities of current-generation commercial LLMs, we consider the task of anomaly detection via the publicly available and highly-studied LHC Olympics dataset. Several current models by OpenAI (GPT-4o, o4-mini, GPT-4.1, and GPT-5) are investigated and their stability tested. Overall, we observe the capacity of the agent-based system to solve this data analysis problem. The best agent-created solutions mirror the performance of human state-of-the-art results.

Authors 5

  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

    Affiliation as printed

    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

  2. Universität Hamburg

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Hamburg

  3. Universität Hamburg

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Hamburg

  4. RWTH Aachen University

    Affiliation as printed

    RWTH Aachen University

  5. Universität Hamburg

    Affiliation as printed

    University of Hamburg

Cited by 1 stored of 1

1 result

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-06).

References 74