A

Easier Said than Done

Amicus Curiae, vol. 7, pp. 757–776

Abstract

Since its legal recognition in 2021, the implementation of Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Dutch Sign Language, NGT) in administrative and legal contexts has been monitored, particularly regarding sign language interpreters in criminal proceedings. Despite the legal entitlement for their use, these interpreters are often not employed in practice. Based on a report funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research, this article investigates the implementation of the Wet Erkenning Nederlandse Gebarentaal (the NGT Recognition Act) by way of a literature review, personal correspondence and semi-structured interviews conducted in 2023. Findings reveal a gap between legal provisions and actual practice, attributed to a lack of awareness of Deaf culture, interpreter positioning, legislative omissions, and the insufficient participation of deaf individuals. Recommendations for legislative and policy improvements are provided. Keywords: sign language; deaf; empirical; socio-legal; doctrine; interpreters.

Authors 1

  1. Joni Oyserman corresponding Aachen Leiden Law School

    Leiden University

    Affiliation as printed

    Institute for Law, Governance and Society ,

    Leiden Law School , Leiden University

Cited by 0 stored of 0

No patents citing this paper on Lens.org (checked 2026-10-11).

References 0